When Parents Choose Gender: Intersex, Children, and the Law - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2016 Autumn;24(4):474-496.
doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fww014. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
Affiliations
- PMID: 28057709
- DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fww014
When Parents Choose Gender: Intersex, Children, and the Law
Melanie Newbould. Med Law Rev. 2016 Autumn.
Abstract
In England and Wales, it is usually lawful for those with parental responsibility to consent to treatment on children who have not acquired legal capacity, providing that they are acting in the child's best interests. Whilst in most instances this process is unproblematic and the decisions made are non-controversial, there are troubling examples where this is more problematic. The difficulties for a family with a child who has an intersex condition will be considered to illustrate that there may be cases of medical and surgical treatment where even though both parents and doctors agree on a course of action in good faith, the treatment administered may not necessarily be in the best interests of the child. Sometimes, procedures carried out on an infant apparently in their best interests may later be a cause of regret to the child as an adult. The law in England and Wales will be examined to investigate other examples of controversial treatments of young children involving legal interventions to consider whether there are any parallels and what the implications of these might be to the intersex child. A model suggested by a Columbian legal case from 1995 is discussed. The courts ruled that infantile sex assignment surgery is lawful only following very stringent consent procedures. The possibility is considered that guidelines defining the consent procedure may afford some protection for the intersex child.
Keywords: Best interests; Children; Genital surgery; Intersex.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
- Non-consensual sterilization of the adult with learning disabilities.
Knifton C. Knifton C. Br J Nurs. 1998 Oct 22-Nov 11;7(19):1172-6. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1998.7.19.5578. Br J Nurs. 1998. PMID: 9866467 - Shaping parents, shaping penises: How medical teams frame parents' decisions in response to hypospadias.
Roen K, Hegarty P. Roen K, et al. Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Nov;23(4):967-981. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12333. Epub 2018 Jul 27. Br J Health Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30054962 - Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
Rossiter GP. Rossiter GP. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 May;35(2):132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb01855.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995. PMID: 7677674 Review. - ‘You don’t Need Proof When You’ve Got Instinct!’: Gut Feelings and Some Limits to Parental Authority.
Birchley G. Birchley G. In: Huxtable R, ter Meulen R, editors. The Voices and Rooms of European Bioethics [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2015. Chapter 10. In: Huxtable R, ter Meulen R, editors. The Voices and Rooms of European Bioethics [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2015. Chapter 10. PMID: 26334082 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
- What does the best interests principle of the convention on the rights of the child mean for paediatric healthcare?
März JW. März JW. Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Nov;181(11):3805-3816. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04609-2. Epub 2022 Sep 9. Eur J Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36083315 Free PMC article. Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources