An Audit of the Use of Gonadorelin Analogues to Prevent Recurrent Acute Symptoms in Patients with Acute Porphyria in the United Kingdom - PubMed (original) (raw)

An Audit of the Use of Gonadorelin Analogues to Prevent Recurrent Acute Symptoms in Patients with Acute Porphyria in the United Kingdom

Danja Schulenburg-Brand et al. JIMD Rep. 2017.

Abstract

Severe recurrent acute attacks of porphyria have traditionally been treated with either prophylactic human haemin or gonadorelin analogues (GnA) in females. Evidence on the most effective treatment for this patient subgroup is lacking. This audit surveyed the use of prophylactic GnA in the UK.Twenty female patients (who experienced between 2 and 45 acute attacks of porphyria requiring hospitalisation and treatment with human haemin prior to GnA prophylaxis) were included in the audit. Data was retrospectively collected based on patient history and case review.Twenty three treatment courses were given lasting a median period of 12 months. Monthly subcutaneous Goserelin was most commonly used. In three patients in whom timing with the menstrual cycle was not considered, an acute attack occurred after initiation of the first dose. The majority of patients experienced oestrogen deficiency symptoms during treatment. Fifty percent of the prescribed courses of GnA resulted in a degree of clinical benefit. This successfully treated group experienced between 3 and 20 acute attacks prior to and between 0 and 6 acute attacks during GnA treatment.The audit revealed large variation in practice in the United Kingdom regarding indication, duration of treatment, specific drug used and management of side effects. In view of the limited treatment options available for this cohort and the mixed outcome successes reported, we believe it is reasonable for porphyria specialists to continue offering GnA treatment to women with severe recurrent debilitating acute attacks of porphyria associated with the menstrual cycle, and we propose best practice guidelines to standardise management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Danja Schulenburg-Brand, Tricia Gardiner, Simon Guppy, David C. Rees, Penelope Stein, Julian Barth, M. Felicity Stewart and Michael Badminton declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson KE. LHRH analogues for hormonal manipulation in acute intermittent poprhyria. Semin Hematol. 1989;26:10–15. - PubMed
    1. Anderson KE, Spitz IM, Bardin CW, et al. A gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue prevents cyclical attacks of porphyria. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1469–1474. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1990.00390190115018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson C, Innala E, Bäckström T. Acute intermittent porphyria in women: clinical expression, use and experience of exogenous sex hormones. A population-based study in northern Sweden. J Intern Med. 2003;254:176–183. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01172.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson KE, Spitz IM, Sassa S, et al. Prevention of cyclical attacks of acute intermittent porphyria with a long-acting agonist of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:643–645. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198409063111006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Badminton MN, Whatley SD, Elder GH. The porphyrias and other disorders of porphyrin metabolism. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. pp. 1031–1055.

LinkOut - more resources