Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk? - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2017 Aug;100(8):6125-6138.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12519. Epub 2017 May 24.
Affiliations
- PMID: 28551193
- DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-12519
Free article
Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk?
K S McCarthy et al. J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug.
Free article
Abstract
Fluid milk consumption has declined for decades while consumption of nondairy alternatives has increased. A better understanding of why consumers purchase fluid milk or nondairy alternatives is needed to assist increased sales of milk or maintain sales without further decline. The objective of this study was to determine the extrinsic attributes that drive purchase within each product category. The second objective was to determine the personal values behind the purchase of each beverage type to give further understanding why particular attributes are important. An online conjoint survey was launched with 702 dairy consumers, 172 nondairy consumers, and 125 consumers of both beverages. Individual means-end chain interviews were conducted with fluid milk consumers (n = 75), plant-based alternative consumers (n = 68), and consumers of both beverages (n = 78). Fat content was the most important attribute for dairy milk followed by package size and label claims. Consumers of fluid milk preferred 1 or 2% fat content, gallon, or half-gallon packaging, conventionally pasteurized store-brand milk. Sugar level was the most important attribute for plant-based beverages, followed by plant source and package size. Almond milk was the most desirable plant source, and half-gallon packaging was the most preferred packaging. Means-end chain interviews results suggested that maintaining a balanced diet and healthy lifestyle was important to all consumer groups. Lactose free was an important attribute for plant-based alternative consumers and consumers of both dairy and nondairy. A distinguishing characteristic of those who only drank nondairy plant-based alternatives was that plant-based beverages contributed to a goal to consume less animal products, beliefs about animal mistreatment, and perceived lesser effect on the environment than fluid milk. Unique to fluid milk consumers was that fluid milk was perceived as a staple food item. These results suggest that the dairy industry should focus on the nutrition value of milk and educating consumers about misconceptions regarding dairy milk. Future beverage innovation should include the development of lactose-free milk that is also appealing to consumers in flavor.
Keywords: conjoint analysis; consumer liking; fluid milk; means-end chain analysis; nondairy alternative.
Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- Consumer desires and perceptions of lactose-free milk.
Rizzo PV, Harwood WS, Drake MA. Rizzo PV, et al. J Dairy Sci. 2020 Aug;103(8):6950-6966. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17940. Epub 2020 Jun 3. J Dairy Sci. 2020. PMID: 32505391 - Identification and characterization of fluid milk consumer groups.
Harwood WS, Drake MA. Harwood WS, et al. J Dairy Sci. 2018 Oct;101(10):8860-8874. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14855. Epub 2018 Aug 9. J Dairy Sci. 2018. PMID: 30100510 - Child preferences and perceptions of fluid milk in school meal programs.
Sipple LR, Schiano AN, Cadwallader DC, Drake MA. Sipple LR, et al. J Dairy Sci. 2021 May;104(5):5303-5318. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19546. Epub 2021 Mar 2. J Dairy Sci. 2021. PMID: 33663854 - A 100-Year Review: The production of fluid (market) milk.
Barbano DM. Barbano DM. J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):9894-9902. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13561. J Dairy Sci. 2017. PMID: 29153178 Review. - Milk Analog: Plant based alternatives to conventional milk, production, potential and health concerns.
Paul AA, Kumar S, Kumar V, Sharma R. Paul AA, et al. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(18):3005-3023. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1674243. Epub 2019 Oct 16. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020. PMID: 31617734 Review.
Cited by
- Dairy milk: There are alternatives but no equivalents.
Beckett EL, Cassettari T, Starck C, Fayet-Moore F. Beckett EL, et al. Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Jul 19;12(10):8470-8482. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4301. eCollection 2024 Oct. Food Sci Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39479642 Free PMC article. - Addressing concerns about sustainability and animal welfare: Investigating consumers' adoption and behavioral intention towards plant-based eggs.
Chen HS, Chao CT, Lin IK. Chen HS, et al. Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Aug 23;12(10):8171-8185. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4398. eCollection 2024 Oct. Food Sci Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39479614 Free PMC article. - Plant-Based Beverages: Consumption Habits, Perception and Knowledge on a Sample of Portuguese Citizens.
Anjos O, Pires PCP, Gonçalves J, Estevinho LM, Mendonça AG, Guiné RPF. Anjos O, et al. Foods. 2024 Oct 11;13(20):3235. doi: 10.3390/foods13203235. Foods. 2024. PMID: 39456297 Free PMC article. - Effect of pilot-scale high-temperature short-time processing on the retention of key micronutrients in a fortified almond-based beverage: implications for fortification of plant-based milk alternatives.
Redan BW, Zuklic J, Cai J, Warren J, Carter C, Wan J, Sandhu AK, Black DG, Jackson LS. Redan BW, et al. Front Nutr. 2024 Sep 24;11:1468828. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1468828. eCollection 2024. Front Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39381350 Free PMC article. - Driving Factors Influencing the Decision to Purchase Plant-Based Beverages: A Sample from Türkiye.
Baş M, Kahriman M, Ayakdas G, Hajhamidiasl L, Koseoglu SK. Baş M, et al. Foods. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):1760. doi: 10.3390/foods13111760. Foods. 2024. PMID: 38890988 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources