Updated report on tools to measure outcomes of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Updated report on tools to measure outcomes of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome
Dejan B Budimirovic et al. J Neurodev Disord. 2017.
Abstract
Objective: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) has been the neurodevelopmental disorder with the most active translation of preclinical breakthroughs into clinical trials. This process has led to a critical assessment of outcome measures, which resulted in a comprehensive review published in 2013. Nevertheless, the disappointing outcome of several recent phase III drug trials in FXS, and parallel efforts at evaluating behavioral endpoints for trials in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), has emphasized the need for re-assessing outcome measures and revising recommendations for FXS.
Methods: After performing an extensive database search (PubMed, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)/National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s www.ClinicalTrials.gov, etc.) to determine progress since 2013, members of the Working Groups who published the 2013 Report evaluated the available outcome measures for FXS and related neurodevelopmental disorders using the COSMIN grading system of levels of evidence. The latter has also been applied to a British survey of endpoints for ASD. In addition, we also generated an informal classification of outcome measures for use in FXS intervention studies as instruments appropriate to detect shorter- or longer-term changes.
Results: To date, a total of 22 double-blind controlled clinical trials in FXS have been identified through www.ClinicalTrials.gov and an extensive literature search. The vast majority of these FDA/NIH-registered clinical trials has been completed between 2008 and 2015 and has targeted the core excitatory/inhibitory imbalance present in FXS and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Limited data exist on reliability and validity for most tools used to measure cognitive, behavioral, and other problems in FXS in these trials and other studies. Overall, evidence for most tools supports a moderate tool quality grading. Data on sensitivity to treatment, currently under evaluation, could improve ratings for some cognitive and behavioral tools. Some progress has also been made at identifying promising biomarkers, mainly on blood-based and neurophysiological measures.
Conclusion: Despite the tangible progress in implementing clinical trials in FXS, the increasing data on measurement properties of endpoints, and the ongoing process of new tool development, the vast majority of outcome measures are at the moderate quality level with limited information on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to treatment. This situation is not unique to FXS, since reviews of endpoints for ASD have arrived at similar conclusions. These findings, in conjunction with the predominance of parent-based measures particularly in the behavioral domain, indicate that endpoint development in FXS needs to continue with an emphasis on more objective measures (observational, direct testing, biomarkers) that reflect meaningful improvements in quality of life. A major continuous challenge is the development of measurement tools concurrently with testing drug safety and efficacy in clinical trials.
Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder; Clinical trials; Fragile X syndrome; Intellectual disability; Outcome measures.
Similar articles
- Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P. Crider K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article. - The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Soll RF, et al. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834 - Response to Placebo in Fragile X Syndrome Clinical Trials: An Initial Analysis.
Luu S, Province H, Berry-Kravis E, Hagerman R, Hessl D, Vaidya D, Lozano R, Rosselot H, Erickson C, Kaufmann WE, Budimirovic DB. Luu S, et al. Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 11;10(9):629. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10090629. Brain Sci. 2020. PMID: 32932789 Free PMC article. - Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome.
Schaefer TL, Davenport MH, Erickson CA. Schaefer TL, et al. Appl Clin Genet. 2015 Apr 7;8:75-93. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S35673. eCollection 2015. Appl Clin Genet. 2015. PMID: 25897255 Free PMC article. Review. - Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].
Patnode CD, Perdue LA, Rossom RC, Rushkin MC, Redmond N, Thomas RG, Lin JS. Patnode CD, et al. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Feb. Report No.: 19-05257-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Feb. Report No.: 19-05257-EF-1. PMID: 32129963 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
- A novel eye-tracking paradigm for indexing social avoidance-related behavior in fragile X syndrome.
Klusek J, Moser C, Schmidt J, Abbeduto L, Roberts JE. Klusek J, et al. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2020 Jan;183(1):5-16. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32757. Epub 2019 Aug 16. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2020. PMID: 31418535 Free PMC article. - Auditory EEG Biomarkers in Fragile X Syndrome: Clinical Relevance.
Ethridge LE, De Stefano LA, Schmitt LM, Woodruff NE, Brown KL, Tran M, Wang J, Pedapati EV, Erickson CA, Sweeney JA. Ethridge LE, et al. Front Integr Neurosci. 2019 Oct 9;13:60. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00060. eCollection 2019. Front Integr Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31649514 Free PMC article. - Developmental associations between cognition and adaptive behavior in intellectual and developmental disability.
Dakopolos A, Condy E, Smith E, Harvey D, Kaat AJ, Coleman J, Riley K, Berry-Kravis E, Hessl D. Dakopolos A, et al. J Neurodev Disord. 2024 Jun 13;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09542-z. J Neurodev Disord. 2024. PMID: 38872099 Free PMC article. - Bringing the Laboratory Home: PANDABox Telehealth-Based Assessment of Neurodevelopmental Risk in Children.
Kelleher BL, Halligan T, Witthuhn N, Neo WS, Hamrick L, Abbeduto L. Kelleher BL, et al. Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 28;11:1634. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01634. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32849001 Free PMC article. - Developmental Associations between Cognition and Adaptive Behavior in Intellectual and Developmental Disability.
Dakopolos A, Condy E, Smith E, Harvey D, Kaat AJ, Coleman J, Riley K, Berry-Kravis E, Hessl D. Dakopolos A, et al. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Jan 8:rs.3.rs-3684708. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3684708/v1. Res Sq. 2024. PMID: 38260292 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources