Urinothorax: a systematic review - PubMed (original) (raw)

Urinothorax: a systematic review

María E Toubes et al. J Thorac Dis. 2017 May.

Abstract

Background: The characteristics of patients with urinothorax (UT) are poorly defined.

Methods: A systematic review was performed searching for studies reporting clinical findings, pleural fluid (PF) characteristics, and the most effective treatment of UT. Case descriptions and retrospective studies were included.

Results: The review included 78 studies with a total of 88 patients. Median age was 45 years, male/female ratio was 1.6:1 and in 76% of cases the etiology was trauma. Pleural effusion (PE) was predominantly unilateral (87%) and occupied over 2/3 of the hemithorax in most cases (64.4%). PF was straw-colored (72.7%) or hematic (27.3%) with urine-like odor in all cases. PF was transudate in 56.2% of cases (18/32) and among 14 exudates (43.8%), 3 were concordant exudates, 1 protein-discordant and 10 LDH-discordant, with lymphocyte (44.4%) and neutrophil (38.5%) predominance. The PF/serum (PF/S) creatinine ratio was >1 in all cases except one (97.9%). The diagnosis was established on the basis of PF/S creatinine ratio >1 (56.6%), urinary tract contrast extravasation (12%), abnormal computed tomography (8.4%), laparotomy findings (6%), and association of obstructive uropathy with PE (6%). The outcome was favorable (74/77; 96.1%) when treatment was direct towards the uropathy (alone or associated with thoracentesis/thoracic drainage). Outcome was unfavorable in the 15 patients who were only treated with thoracentesis/thoracic drainage.

Conclusions: UT is usually traumatic, unilateral, and PF does not have a specific pattern or cellularity predominance, with a PF/S creatinine ratio almost always >1. Treatment should include the uropathy, with or without PF evacuation.

Keywords: Pleural effusion (PE); pleural fluid (PF); urinothorax (UT); urothorax.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

PRISMA flowchart of evidence synthesis. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Age group distribution of patients with urinothorax.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. France NE, Back EH. Neonatal ascites associated with urethral obstruction. Arch Dis Child 1954;29:565-8. 10.1136/adc.29.148.565 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corriere JN, Miller WT, Murphy JJ. Hydronephrosis as a cause of pleural effusion. Radiology 1968;90:79-84. 10.1148/90.1.79 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Pachon E, Romero S. Urinothorax: a new approach. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2006;12:259-63. 10.1097/01.mcp.0000230628.65515.86 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535. 10.1136/bmj.b2535 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hume HA, Stevens LW, Erb WH. Urothorax. An unusual complication of multiple traumatic injuries. N Engl J Med 1962;267:289-91. 10.1056/NEJM196208092670606 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources