"Caught with a body" yet protected by law? Calling 911 for opioid overdose in the context of the Good Samaritan Law - PubMed (original) (raw)
"Caught with a body" yet protected by law? Calling 911 for opioid overdose in the context of the Good Samaritan Law
Amanda D Latimore et al. Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Dec.
Abstract
Background: To address soaring opioid overdose fatality rates, 41U.S. states have passed Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs) extending legal immunity to overdose bystanders who call for emergency assistance. This study, conducted during the period that followed implementation of a GSL, aimed to characterize current factors determining the decision to call for emergency medical help (911) at the scene of an overdose with specific attention to exploring the role of the GSL as one such factor in decision-making.
Methods: We conducted 22 in-depth interviews with needle exchange program clients in Baltimore, MD.
Results: Most participants reported calling 911 or witnessing a 911 call after drug overdose, but widely remained fearful of arrest for drug or paraphernalia possession, homicide, outstanding warrants, and/or trespassing. These concerns were underpinned by a history of police maltreatment and threat, and strong distrust of police; concerns which were specifically related to perceptions of police conduct at the scene of an overdose as well as perceptions of police conduct in general. Additional considerations included: fear of losing housing, informal shelter or custody of children; encountering social stigma; and facing violent and fatal repercussions at the hands of local drug dealers. Additionally, some participants did not perceive a significant enough medical risk to call 911. Two thirds of participants were unaware of the GSL. Some believed a GSL would positively impact law enforcement behaviour and increase the likelihood of a bystander call; but due to distrust of police, others believed the GSL would have little influence on bystander decisions.
Conclusion: Insights from overdose bystanders during the post-implementation period of a Good Samaritan Law demonstrate persistent deterrents to bystanders calling 911 after overdose. Additional measures are needed to align policy aims with lived experiences of overdose bystanders, and to achieve overdose prevention aims.
Keywords: Drug overdose; Emergency treatment; Harm reduction; Law enforcement; Opioid-related disorders; Public policy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- Knowledge of the 911 Good Samaritan Law and 911-calling behavior of overdose witnesses.
Jakubowski A, Kunins HV, Huxley-Reicher Z, Siegler A. Jakubowski A, et al. Subst Abus. 2018;39(2):233-238. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1387213. Epub 2017 Nov 13. Subst Abus. 2018. PMID: 28972445 - Knowledge of Good Samaritan Laws and Beliefs About Arrests Among Persons Who Inject Drugs a Year After Policy Change in Baltimore, Maryland.
Schneider KE, Park JN, Allen ST, Weir BW, Sherman SG. Schneider KE, et al. Public Health Rep. 2020 May/Jun;135(3):393-400. doi: 10.1177/0033354920915439. Epub 2020 Apr 7. Public Health Rep. 2020. PMID: 32264789 Free PMC article. - Why are some people who have received overdose education and naloxone reticent to call Emergency Medical Services in the event of overdose?
Koester S, Mueller SR, Raville L, Langegger S, Binswanger IA. Koester S, et al. Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Oct;48:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 19. Int J Drug Policy. 2017. PMID: 28734745 Free PMC article. - The effectiveness of drug-related Good Samaritan laws: A review of the literature.
Moallef S, Hayashi K. Moallef S, et al. Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Apr;90:102773. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102773. Epub 2020 May 25. Int J Drug Policy. 2021. PMID: 32467017 Review. - Review and inventory of 911 Good Samaritan Law Provisions in the United States.
Reader SW, Walton GH, Linder SH. Reader SW, et al. Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Dec;110:103896. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103896. Epub 2022 Nov 4. Int J Drug Policy. 2022. PMID: 36343430 Review.
Cited by
- Post-overdose interventions triggered by calling 911: Centering the perspectives of people who use drugs (PWUDs).
Wagner KD, Harding RW, Kelley R, Labus B, Verdugo SR, Copulsky E, Bowles JM, Mittal ML, Davidson PJ. Wagner KD, et al. PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223823. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31622401 Free PMC article. - Socioeconomic inequalities and Black/White disparities in US cocaine-involved overdose mortality risk.
Cano M, Salas-Wright CP, Oh S, Noel L, Hernandez D, Vaughn MG. Cano M, et al. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;57(10):2023-2035. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02255-5. Epub 2022 Mar 6. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35249125 - Protocol for a multi-site study of the effects of overdose prevention education with naloxone distribution program in Skåne County, Sweden.
Troberg K, Isendahl P, Blomé MA, Dahlman D, Håkansson A. Troberg K, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2470-3. BMC Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32028921 Free PMC article. - Longitudinal polysubstance use patterns and non-fatal overdose: A repeated measures latent class analysis.
Karamouzian M, Cui Z, Hayashi K, DeBeck K, Reddon H, Buxton JA, Kerr T. Karamouzian M, et al. Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Jan 4:104301. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104301. Online ahead of print. Int J Drug Policy. 2024. PMID: 38182524 - Using qualitative system dynamics modeling to understand overdose bystander behavior in the context of Connecticut's Good Samaritan Laws and identify effective policy options.
Thompson RL, Sabounchi NS, Ali SS, Heimer R, D'Onofrio G, Heckmann R. Thompson RL, et al. Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jun 27;21(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00990-3. Harm Reduct J. 2024. PMID: 38937759 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous