Ultra-processed Food Intake and Obesity: What Really Matters for Health-Processing or Nutrient Content? - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Ultra-processed Food Intake and Obesity: What Really Matters for Health-Processing or Nutrient Content?

Jennifer M Poti et al. Curr Obes Rep. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this narrative review was to summarize and critique recent evidence evaluating the association between ultra-processed food intake and obesity.

Recent findings: Four of five studies found that higher purchases or consumption of ultra-processed food was associated with overweight/obesity. Additional studies reported relationships between ultra-processed food intake and higher fasting glucose, metabolic syndrome, increases in total and LDL cholesterol, and risk of hypertension. It remains unclear whether associations can be attributed to processing itself or the nutrient content of ultra-processed foods. Only three of nine studies used a prospective design, and the potential for residual confounding was high. Recent research provides fairly consistent support for the association of ultra-processed food intake with obesity and related cardiometabolic outcomes. There is a clear need for further studies, particularly those using longitudinal designs and with sufficient control for confounding, to potentially confirm these findings in different populations and to determine whether ultra-processed food consumption is associated with obesity independent of nutrient content.

Keywords: Food processing; Obesity; Overweight; Processed food; Ultra-processed food.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: Jennifer M. Poti, Bianca Braga, and Bo Qin declare they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tapsell LC, Neale EP, Satija A, Hu FB. Foods, Nutrients, and Dietary Patterns: Interconnections and Implications for Dietary Guidelines. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(3):445–54. doi: 10.3945/an.115.011718. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monteiro CA. Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(5):729–31. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009005291. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moubarac JC, Parra DC, Cannon G, Monteiro C. Food classification systems based on food processing: significance nd implications for policies and actions - a systematic literature review and assessment. Curr Obes Rep. 2014;3:256–72. This paper was the first systematic review to evaluate existing classification systems that categorize products by degree of food processing. Of the five identified systems, the NOVA food processing classification was rated highest in quality based on criteria for being a specific, coherent, clear, comprehensive and workable system. - PubMed
    1. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac JC, Levy RB, Louzada ML, Jaime PC. The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr. 2017:1–13. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000234. This commentary outlines the NOVA food processing classification and summarizes the use of NOVA in numerous studies to describe ultra-processed food consumption, examine the associations of ultra-processed foods with dietary quality and diet-related health outcomes, and inform dietary guidelines. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pan American Health Organization of the World Health Organization. Ultra-processed Food and Drink Products in Latin America: Trends, Impact on Obesity, Policy Implications. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization of the WHO; 2015.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources