Morphological and genetic factors shape the microbiome of a seabird species (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) more than environmental and social factors - PubMed (original) (raw)

Morphological and genetic factors shape the microbiome of a seabird species (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) more than environmental and social factors

Douglas S Pearce et al. Microbiome. 2017.

Abstract

Background: The microbiome provides multiple benefits to animal hosts that can profoundly impact health and behavior. Microbiomes are well-characterized in humans and other animals in controlled settings, yet assessments of wild bird microbial communities remain vastly understudied. This is particularly true for pelagic seabirds with unique life histories that differ from terrestrial bird species. This study was designed to examine how morphological, genetic, environmental, and social factors affect the microbiome of a burrow-nesting seabird species, Leach's storm petrel (Oceanodroma leucorhoa). These seabirds are highly olfactory and may rely on microbiome-mediated odor cues during mate selection. Composition and structure of bacterial communities associated with the uropygial gland and brood patch were assessed using 16S rRNA amplicon-based Illumina Mi-Seq analysis and compared to burrow-associated bacterial communities. This is the first study to examine microbial diversity associated with multiple body sites on a seabird species.

Results: Results indicate that sex and skin site contribute most to bacterial community variation in Leach's storm petrels and that major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genotype may impact the composition of bacterial assemblages in males. In contrast to terrestrial birds and other animals, environmental and social interactions do not significantly influence storm petrel-associated bacterial assemblages. Thus, individual morphological and genetic influences outweighed environmental and social factors on microbiome composition.

Conclusions: Contrary to observations of terrestrial birds, microbiomes of Leach's storm petrels vary most by the sex of the bird and by the body site sampled, rather than environmental surroundings or social behavior.

Keywords: Brood patch; Leach’s storm petrel; Skin microbiome; Uropygial gland.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval

The research was approved by University of California Davis Animal Care and Use Protocol #17588 and Canadian Wildlife Service Permit SC2742. Bird blood samples were imported and shipped to UC Davis under USDA Veterinary Permit for Importation and Transportation of Controlled Materials and Organisms and Vectors #122202. The University of California Davis has an Animal Welfare Assurance on file with the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. The Assurance Number is A3433-01, protocol title: Collaborative Proposal: A New Model for Chemical Ecology: Integrating Chemistry, Genetics and Behavior to Understand the Role of Individual Scent in a Colonial Nesting Seabird.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Relative abundance of bird-associated bacterial communities by phylum (a) and most abundant families (b). Both body sites were characterized by highly abundant Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Families represent the top 20 most abundant OTUs. Colors of the families in b correspond to the phyla represented in a. Proteobacteria are marked as (β) Betaproteobacteria, (α) Alphaproteobacteria, and (γ) Gammaproteobacteria. Remaining families not represented in this figure are listed in Additional file 9: Table S4

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

PCoA of female uropygial gland, female brood patch, male uropygial gland, and male brood patch bacterial communities based on weighted UniFrac dissimilarity. Green circles represent DAB2 heterozygous individuals, blue squares represent DAB2 homozygous individuals, and gray triangles represent individuals lacking genotype data. Morphological and genetic factors are represented by arrows, and the length of each arrow is proportional to the explanatory power of each variable. Female wing chord length explained 50% of variation in brood patch bacterial community structure (R 2 = 0.500, p = 0.024, n = 14). DAB2 homozygosity explained 72% of variation in male uropygial gland community structure (weighted UniFrac pseudo-F = 1.859, p = 0.015, n = 8), although sample size was small for this analysis. Wing chord was too small to represent for female uropygial gland analysis

References

    1. Org E, Parks BW, Joo JWJ, Emert B, Schwartzman W, Kang EY, et al. Genetic and environmental control of host-gut microbiota interactions. Genome Res. 2015;25:1558–1569. doi: 10.1101/gr.194118.115. -DOI -PMC -PubMed
    1. Ruiz-Rodríguez M, Valdivia E, Soler JJ, Martín-Vivaldi M, Martín-Platero AM, Martínez-Bueno M. Symbiotic bacteria living in the hoopoe’s uropygial gland prevent feather degradation. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:3621–3626. doi: 10.1242/jeb.031336. -DOI -PubMed
    1. Colston TJ, Jackson CR. Microbiome evolution along divergent branches of the vertebrate tree of life: what is known and unknown. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:3776–3800. doi: 10.1111/mec.13730. -DOI -PubMed
    1. Amato KR. Co-evolution in context: The importance of studying gut microbiomes in wild animals. Microbiome Sci Med 2013;1. doi:10.2478/micsm-2013-0002.
    1. McFall-Ngai M, Hadfield MG, Bosch TCG, Carey HV, Domazet-Lošo T, Douglas AE, et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:3229–3236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218525110. -DOI -PMC -PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources