Why Don't I Help You? The Relationship between Role Stressors and Helping Behavior from a Cognitive Dissonance Perspective - PubMed (original) (raw)

Why Don't I Help You? The Relationship between Role Stressors and Helping Behavior from a Cognitive Dissonance Perspective

Li Zhang et al. Front Psychol. 2018.

Abstract

This paper proposes that role stressors decrease helping behavior by undermining employees' normative commitment from a cognitive dissonance perspective and social exchange theory. We also propose two competitive assumptions of the moderating effect of perceived organizational support (POS). In this paper, we first examine these hypotheses in Study 1 and then verify the cognitive dissonance perspective in Study 2. In Study 1, we collected data from 350 employees of two enterprises in China. The results indicated that role stressors had a negative link with helping behavior via the mediating role of normative commitment. The results also showed that POS strengthened the negative relationship between role stressors and normative commitment. In Study 2, we invited 104 employees to participate in a scenario experiment. The results found that role stressors had an impact on normative commitment via dissonance. Our studies verified the combination of cognitive dissonance perspective and social exchange theory to explain the impact of role stressors on helping behavior.

Keywords: cognitive dissonance; helping behavior; normative commitment; perceived organizational support; role stressors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Research model.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

The moderating effect of perceived organizational support on the relationship between role conflict and normative commitment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addae H. M., Praveen Parboteeah K., Velinor N. (2008). Role stressors and organizational commitment: public sector employment in St. Lucia. Int. J. Manpow. 29 567–582. 10.1108/01437720810904220 - DOI
    1. Aronson E., Fried C., Stone J. (1991). Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy. Am. J. Public Health 81 1636–1638. 10.2105/AJPH.81.12.1636 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bansal H. S., Irving P. G., Taylor S. F. (2004). A three-component model of customer to service providers. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 32 234–250. 10.1177/0092070304263332 - DOI
    1. Barling J., Kelloway E. K., Frone M. R. (eds) (2004). Handbook of Work Stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    1. Bashshur M. R., Hernández A., González-Romá V. (2011). When managers and their teams disagree: a longitudinal look at the consequences of differences in perceptions of organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 96 558–573. 10.1037/a0022675 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources