Implications of possible interpretations of 'greenhouse gas balance' in the Paris Agreement - PubMed (original) (raw)

Implications of possible interpretations of 'greenhouse gas balance' in the Paris Agreement

J Fuglestvedt et al. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018.

Abstract

The main goal of the Paris Agreement as stated in Article 2 is 'holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C'. Article 4 points to this long-term goal and the need to achieve 'balance between anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases'. This statement on 'greenhouse gas balance' is subject to interpretation, and clarifications are needed to make it operational for national and international climate policies. We study possible interpretations from a scientific perspective and analyse their climatic implications. We clarify how the implications for individual gases depend on the metrics used to relate them. We show that the way in which balance is interpreted, achieved and maintained influences temperature outcomes. Achieving and maintaining net-zero CO2-equivalent emissions conventionally calculated using GWP100 (100-year global warming potential) and including substantial positive contributions from short-lived climate-forcing agents such as methane would result in a sustained decline in global temperature. A modified approach to the use of GWP100 (that equates constant emissions of short-lived climate forcers with zero sustained emission of CO2) results in global temperatures remaining approximately constant once net-zero CO2-equivalent emissions are achieved and maintained. Our paper provides policymakers with an overview of issues and choices that are important to determine which approach is most appropriate in the context of the Paris Agreement.This article is part of the theme issue 'The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.

Keywords: CO2 equivalence; Paris Agreement; emission metrics; greenhouse gas balance; net-zero emissions.

© 2018 The Authors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Elements of Article 4 discussed in this analysis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Range of permissible GHG emission scenarios for CO2, CH4, N2O and F-gases for the 1.5°C and 2°C goals. (b) Example of aggregated emissions paths in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions based on GWP100 (SAR) indicating timing of net-zero CO2-equivalent emissions. (c) Timing of net-zero CO2-equivalent emissions as a function of metric type and time horizon.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(a) Annual CO2-fe emissions and (b) global mean temperatures for scenarios in the IPCC AR5 Scenario Database. CO2-fe emissions have been calculated based on the total anthropogenic forcing in the Scenario Database. Temperatures are taken directly from the Database.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Dependence of negative CO2 emissions needed to balance residual emissions of CH4 and N2O (given as Mt CH4 and Mt N2O, respectively) on metric choice. For the left-hand panel, the bar height indicates the mean of the distribution of CH4 and N2O emissions in 2100, with the extent of the error bar marking the 5th–95th percentiles of the distribution. For the right-hand panel the bar heights indicate the mean net negative CO2 emissions needed to balance the combinations of 2100 CH4 (orange) and N2O emissions (brown) present in the scenarios partitioned by metric (_x_-axis). The 5th–95th percentiles of the distribution of the total required net negative CO2 emissions are marked by the vertical extent of the bars.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(a) Global mean surface temperature response to maintained net-zero balance of CO2-equivalent emissions from 2100 for various metrics. Thin lines indicate the range of response for the net-zero balances imposed using constant 2100 CH4 and N2O emissions from the complete set of 430–480 ppm scenarios, while thick lines indicate the response for the balance imposed from 2100 for the RCP2.6 scenario. (b) Calculations are done as perturbations above an RCP2.6 background of emissions with the perturbation implemented from 2100 and onwards. The spread in responses reflects the spread in non-CO2 emissions due to scenario and model assumptions.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Correlation between time of net-zero emissions and time of peak warming for various metric choices, including CO2-fe. Grey dashed line represents the 1 : 1 line. Different colours represent the different metric choices, with open squares denoting the 430–480 ppm scenarios and filled symbols the 480–530 ppm scenarios.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peters GP. 2016. The ‘best available science’ to inform 1.5°C policy choices. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 646–649. (10.1038/nclimate3000) - DOI
    1. Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Meinshausen M, Knutti R, Alcamo J, Riahi K, Hare W. 2015. Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 105007 (10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/105007) - DOI
    1. Schleussner C-F, et al. 2016. Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 827–835. (10.1038/nclimate3096) - DOI
    1. Rogelj J, Knutti R. 2016. Geosciences after Paris. Nat. Geosci. 9, 187–189. (10.1038/ngeo2668) - DOI
    1. Allen MR, Fuglestvedt JS, Shine KP, Reisinger A, Pierrehumbert RT, Forster PM. 2016. New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 773–776. (10.1038/nclimate2998) - DOI

LinkOut - more resources