Uniform resolution of compact identifiers for biomedical data - PubMed (original) (raw)

Uniform resolution of compact identifiers for biomedical data

Sarala M Wimalaratne et al. Sci Data. 2018.

Abstract

Most biomedical data repositories issue locally-unique accessions numbers, but do not provide globally unique, machine-resolvable, persistent identifiers for their datasets, as required by publishers wishing to implement data citation in accordance with widely accepted principles. Local accessions may however be prefixed with a namespace identifier, providing global uniqueness. Such "compact identifiers" have been widely used in biomedical informatics to support global resource identification with local identifier assignment. We report here on our project to provide robust support for machine-resolvable, persistent compact identifiers in biomedical data citation, by harmonizing the Identifiers.org and N2T.net (Name-To-Thing) meta-resolvers and extending their capabilities. Identifiers.org services hosted at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), and N2T.net services hosted at the California Digital Library (CDL), can now resolve any given identifier from over 600 source databases to its original source on the Web, using a common registry of prefix-based redirection rules. We believe these services will be of significant help to publishers and others implementing persistent, machine-resolvable citation of research data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. CODATA/ITSCI Task Force on Data Citation. Out of cite, out of mind: The Current State of Practice, Policy and Technology for Data Citation. Data Science Journal 12, 1–75 doi:10.2481/dsj.OSOM13-043 (2013).
    1. RoyalSociety. Science as an Open Enterprise (The Royal Society Science Policy Center, London, 2012).
    1. Uhlir P. (ed.) For attribution: developing data attribution and citation practices and standards: summary of an international workshop. (National Academies, Washington DC, 2012).
    1. Colquhoun D. An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values. Royal Society Open Science 1, 140216 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis J. A. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA 294, 218–228 (2005). - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources