A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index - PubMed (original) (raw)
A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index
Carol Mackersie et al. Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective was to determine self-adjusted output response and speech intelligibility index (SII) in individuals with mild to moderate hearing loss and to measure the effects of prior hearing aid experience.
Design: Thirteen hearing aid users and 13 nonusers, with similar group-mean pure-tone thresholds, listened to prerecorded and preprocessed sentences spoken by a man. Starting with a generic level and spectrum, participants adjusted (1) overall level, (2) high-frequency boost, and (3) low-frequency cut. Participants took a speech perception test after an initial adjustment before making a final adjustment. The three self-selected parameters, along with individual thresholds and real-ear-to-coupler differences, were used to compute output levels and SIIs for the starting and two self-adjusted conditions. The values were compared with an NAL second nonlinear threshold-based prescription (NAL-NL2) and, for the hearing aid users, performance of their existing hearing aids.
Results: All participants were able to complete the self-adjustment process. The generic starting condition provided outputs (between 2 and 8 kHz) and SIIs that were significantly below those prescribed by NAL-NL2. Both groups increased SII to values that were not significantly different from prescription. The hearing aid users, but not the nonusers, increased high-frequency output and SII significantly after taking the speech perception test. Seventeen of the 26 participants (65%) met an SII criterion of 60% under the generic starting condition. The proportion increased to 23 out of 26 (88%) after the final self-adjustment. Of the 13 hearing aid users, 8 (62%) met the 60% criterion with their existing hearing aids. With the final self-adjustment, 12 out of 13 (92%) met this criterion.
Conclusions: The findings support the conclusion that user self-adjustment of basic amplification characteristics can be both feasible and effective with or without prior hearing aid experience.
Figures
Figure 1
Mean and range of pure-tone thresholds for two participant groups. For ease of comparison, the means of the alternate group are shown by dash-dot lines.
Figure 2
The upper panel shows the characteristics of the five filters used to generate output spectra. The lower panel shows 25 frequency responses created by combining five levels of low-frequency cut (in steps of 5 dB) with five levels of high-frequency boost (in steps of 2 dB/octave).
Figure 3
Group-mean half-octave levels for the generic starting condition, two self-adjustments and the NAL-NL2 prescribed output for the experienced aids users (top) and non-users (bottom). Real-ear aided responses of the users’ own aid are shown as a thick solid line (top panel).
Figure 4
Overall rms output levels as functions of the listening condition. Error bars show ± 1 standard error.
Figure 5
Half-octave band contributions to SII for the starting and self-adjusted conditions. The shaded area shows the NAL-NL2 prescription (± 2 std.err.), The dotted line shows the frequency-importance function which represents the maximum possible contribution in each band.
Figure 6
Group-mean SII for aid-users and non-users as functions of the listening conditions. Error bars show ± 1 std.err.
Figure 7
Word recognition as a function of Speech Intelligibility Index after the second self-adjustment. The line shows a least-squares fit of the 26 data points to an exponential growth function. An SII of 60% predicts an average word-recognition score in excess of 95%.
Figure 8
Individual starting and self-adjusted SIIs as functions of NAL-NL2 prescribed SII. The number of participants falling above and below an SII criterion of 60% are shown. Solid lines show regression functions for measured versus prescribed SII.
Similar articles
- A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing-Aid Self-Fitting: User Interactions.
Boothroyd A, Mackersie C. Boothroyd A, et al. Am J Audiol. 2017 Oct 12;26(3S):430-435. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0125. Am J Audiol. 2017. PMID: 29049625 Free PMC article. - Amplification Self-Adjustment: Controls and Repeatability.
Boothroyd A, Retana J, Mackersie CL. Boothroyd A, et al. Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):808-821. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001141. Ear Hear. 2022. PMID: 34653029 Free PMC article. - Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
English R, Plant K, Maciejczyk M, Cowan R. English R, et al. Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 2:S45-50. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1133936. Epub 2016 Feb 6. Int J Audiol. 2016. PMID: 26853233 - NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.
Keidser G, Dillon H, Carter L, O'Brien A. Keidser G, et al. Trends Amplif. 2012 Dec;16(4):211-23. doi: 10.1177/1084713812468511. Epub 2012 Nov 30. Trends Amplif. 2012. PMID: 23203416 Free PMC article. Review. - [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].
Hoppe U. Hoppe U. HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):589-94. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0178-y. HNO. 2016. PMID: 27299893 Review. German.
Cited by
- Comparing Self-Fitting Strategies for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Crossover Clinical Trial.
Knoetze M, Manchaiah V, De Sousa K, Moore DR, Swanepoel W. Knoetze M, et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 1;150(9):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2007. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 39052241 Clinical Trial. - Preserving the Role of the Audiologist in a Clinical Technology, Consumer Channel, Clinical Service Model of Hearing Healthcare.
Abrams HB, Singh J. Abrams HB, et al. Semin Hear. 2023 Jun 14;44(3):302-318. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769627. eCollection 2023 Aug. Semin Hear. 2023. PMID: 37484986 Free PMC article. Review. - Feasibility of hearing aid gain self-adjustment using speech recognition.
Yun D, Shen Y, Zhang Z. Yun D, et al. J Acoust Soc Korea. 2022;41(1):76-86. doi: 10.7776/ASK.2022.41.1.076. Epub 2022 Jan 31. J Acoust Soc Korea. 2022. PMID: 35978582 Free PMC article. - Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.
Perry TT, Nelson PB. Perry TT, et al. Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):305-321. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00164. Epub 2022 Mar 22. Am J Audiol. 2022. PMID: 35316099 Free PMC article. - Open Speech Platform: Democratizing Hearing Aid Research.
Sengupta D, Boothroyd A, Zubatiy T, Yalcin C, Hong D, Hamilton SK, Gupta R, Garudadri H. Sengupta D, et al. Int Conf Pervasive Comput Technol Healthc. 2020 May;2020:223-233. doi: 10.1145/3421937.3422017. Int Conf Pervasive Comput Technol Healthc. 2020. PMID: 35261779 Free PMC article.
References
- ANSI/ASA. S3.5-1997 American National Standard Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index R2012
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous