Investigating US medical students' motivation to respond to lapses in professionalism - PubMed (original) (raw)

Investigating US medical students' motivation to respond to lapses in professionalism

Marianne Mak-van der Vossen et al. Med Educ. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Context: As unprofessional behaviour in physicians can compromise patient safety, all physicians should be willing and able to respond to lapses in professionalism. Although students endorse an obligation to respond to lapses, they experience difficulties in doing so. If medical educators knew how students respond and why they choose certain responses, they could support students in responding appropriately.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe medical students' responses to professionalism lapses in peers and faculty staff, and to understand students' motivation for responding or not responding.

Methods: We conducted an explorative, qualitative study using template analysis, in which three researchers independently coded transcripts of semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. We purposefully sampled 18 student representatives convening at a medical education conference. Preliminary open coding of a data subset yielded an initial template, which was applied to further data and modified as necessary. All transcripts were coded using the final template. Finally, three sensitising concepts from the Expectancy-Value-Cost model were used to map participants' responses.

Results: Students mentioned having observed lapses in professionalism in both faculty staff and peers. Students' responses to these lapses were avoiding, addressing, reporting or initiating policy change. Generally, students were not motivated to respond if they did not know how to respond, if they believed responding was futile and if they feared retaliation. Students were motivated to respond if they were personally affected, if they perceived the individual as approachable and if they thought that the whole group of students could benefit from their actions. Expectancy of success, value and costs each appeared to be influenced by (inter)personal and system factors.

Conclusions: The Expectancy-Value-Cost model effectively explains students' motivation for responding to lapses. The (inter)personal and system factors influencing students' motivation to respond are modifiable and can be used by medical educators to enhance students' motivation to respond to lapses in professionalism observed in medical school.

© 2018 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Expectancy, value and costs influencing students' responses to lapses of professionalism in peers and faculty staff

References

    1. Hendelman W, Byszewski A. Formation of medical student professional identity: categorizing lapses of professionalism, and the learning environment. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:139. -PMC -PubMed
    1. Howe A, Miles S, Wright S, Leinster S. Putting theory into practice – a case study in one UK medical school of the nature and extent of unprofessional behaviour over a 6‐year period. Med Teach 2010;32 (10):837–44. -PubMed
    1. Barnhoorn PC, Bolk JH, Ottenhoff‐de Jonge MW, van Mook WN, de Beaufort AJ. Causes and characteristics of medical student referrals to a professional behaviour board. Int J Med Educ 2017;8:19–24. -PMC -PubMed
    1. Parker M, Luke H, Zhang J, Wilkinson D, Peterson R, Ozolins I. The ‘pyramid of professionalism’: seven years of experience with an integrated program of teaching, developing, and assessing professionalism among medical students. Acad Med 2008;83 (8):733–41. -PubMed
    1. Burns CA, Lambros MA, Atkinson HH, Russell G, Fitch MT. Preclinical medical student observations associated with later professionalism concerns. Med Teach 2017;39 (1):38–43. -PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources