A rehabilitation programme for people with multimorbidity versus usual care: A pilot randomized controlled trial - PubMed (original) (raw)

A rehabilitation programme for people with multimorbidity versus usual care: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Kathryn Barker et al. J Comorb. 2018.

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity, the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions, is common in clinical practice. Rehabilitation for people with multimorbidity may provide access to a rehabilitation programme that can address common symptoms and risk factors for multiple chronic diseases.

Objective: The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the feasibility of a rehabilitation programme compared to usual medical care (UMC) in people with multimorbidity and (2) gather preliminary data regarding clinical effects and impact on functional exercise capacity, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life and resource utilization.

Design: A pilot feasibility parallel randomized controlled trial was undertaken. Adults with multimorbidity were randomized to the rehabilitation programme (intervention) or UMC (control). The duration of the rehabilitation programme was 8 weeks and comprised exercise (1 h, twice weekly) and education (1 h, once weekly). The UMC group did not participate in a structured exercise programme.

Results: One hundred people were screened to recruit 16 participants, with a 71% completion rate for the intervention group. The rehabilitation group achieved a mean (standard deviation) improvement in 6-minute walk distance of 44 (41) m and the UMC group of 23 (29) m.

Conclusions: This study suggests that it would be feasible to conduct a larger randomized control trial investigating a rehabilitation programme for people with multimorbidity. Low uptake of the study suggests that refinement of the inclusion criteria, recruitment sources and programme model will be needed to achieve the number of participants required.

Keywords: Multimorbidity; education; exercise; randomized control trial; rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The CONSORT flow diagram of patient flow through the study.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Six-minute walk distance. MMR: multimorbidity rehabilitation programme; UMC: usual medical care. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012; 380(9836): 37–43. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2. - PubMed
    1. Smith SM, Wallace E, O’Dowd T, et al. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3: CD006560 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gijsen R, Hoeymans N, Schellevis FG, et al. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54(7): 661–674. DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00363-2. - PubMed
    1. Caughey GE, Ramsay EN, Vitry AI, et al. Comorbid chronic diseases, discordant impact on mortality in older people: a 14-year longitudinal population study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010; 64(12): 1036–1042. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2009.088260. - PubMed
    1. Bayliss EA, Steiner JF, Fernald DH, et al. Descriptions of barriers to self-care by persons with comorbid chronic diseases. Ann Fam Med 2003; 1(1): 15–21. DOI: 10.1370/afm.4. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources