Total Number of Sets as a Training Volume Quantification Method for Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review - PubMed (original) (raw)

Total Number of Sets as a Training Volume Quantification Method for Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review

Eneko Baz-Valle et al. J Strength Cond Res. 2021.

Abstract

Baz-Valle, E, Fontes-Villalba, M, and Santos-Concejero, J. Total number of sets as a training volume quantification method for muscle hypertrophy: A systematic review. J Strength Cond Res 35(3): 870-878, 2021-This review aimed to determine whether assessing the total number of sets is a valid method to quantify training volume in the context of hypertrophy training. A literature search on 2 databases (PubMed and Scopus) was conducted on May 18, 2018. After analyzing 2,585 resultant articles, studies were included if they met the following criteria: (a) studies were randomized controlled trials, (b) studies compared the total number of sets, repetition range, or training frequency, (c) interventions lasted at least 6 weeks, (d) subjects had a minimum of 1 year of resistance training experience, (e) subjects' age ranged from 18 to 35 years, (f) studies reported morphologic changes through direct or indirect assessment methods, (g) studies involved subjects with no known medical conditions, and (h) studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. According to the results of this review, the total number of sets to failure, or near to, seems to be an adequate method to quantify training volume when the repetition range lies between 6 and 20+ if all the other variables are kept constant. This approach requires further development to assess whether specific numbers of sets are key to inducing optimal muscle gains.

Copyright © 2018 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amirthalingam T, Mavros Y, Wilson G, Clarke J, Mitchell L, Hackett D. Effects of a modified German volume training program on muscular hypertrophy and strength. J Strength Cond Res 31: 3109–3119, 2017.
    1. Au J, Oikawa S, Morton R, Macdonald M, Phillips S. Arterial stiffness is reduced regardless of resistance training load in young men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 49: 342–348, 2017.
    1. Bentzur K, Kravitz L, Lockner D. Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percent body fat in collegiate track and field female athletes: A comparison of four methods. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1985–1991, 2008.
    1. Brigatto F, Braz T, Zanini T, Germano M, Aoki M, Schoenfeld B, et al. Effect of resistance training frequency on neuromuscular performance and muscle morphology after eight weeks in trained men. J Strength Cond Res 33: 2104–2116, 2019.
    1. Campos G, Luecke T, Wendeln H, Toma K, Hagerman F, Murray T, et al. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: Specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol 88: 50–60, 2002.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources