Illegal tusk harvest and the decline of tusk size in the African elephant - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2015 Oct 22;5(22):5216-5229.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.1769. eCollection 2015 Nov.
Affiliations
- PMID: 30151125
- PMCID: PMC6102531
- DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1769
Illegal tusk harvest and the decline of tusk size in the African elephant
Patrick I Chiyo et al. Ecol Evol. 2015.
Abstract
Harvesting of wild populations can cause the evolution of morphological, behavioral, and life history traits that may compromise natural or sexual selection. Despite the vulnerability of large mammals to rapid population decline from harvesting, the evolutionary effects of harvesting on mega-fauna have received limited attention. In elephants, illegal ivory harvesting disproportionately affects older age classes and males because they carry large tusks, but its' effects on tusk size for age or tusk size for stature are less understood. We tested whether severe historical elephant harvests eliminated large tuskers among survivors and whether elephants born thereafter had smaller tusks. Adjusting for the influence of shoulder height - a metric strongly correlated with body size and age and often used as a proxy for age - we compared tusk size for elephants sampled in 1966-1968, prior to severe ivory harvesting in the late 1970s and early 1980s, with tusk size of survivors and elephants born during population recovery in the mid-1990s. In a regional population, tusk length declined by ˜21% in male and by ˜27% in female elephants born during population recovery, while tusk length declined by 22% in males and 37% in females among survivors. Tusk circumference at lip declined by 5% in males but not in females born during population recovery, whereas tusk circumference reduced by 8% in male and by 11% in female survivors. In a single subpopulation, mean tusk length at mean basal tusk circumference declined by 12.4% in males and 21% in females. Tusk size varied between elephant social groups. Tusk homogeneity within social groups and the often high genetic similarity within social groups suggest that tusk size may be heritable. Our findings support a hypothesis of selection of large tuskers by poachers as a driver of the decline in tusk size for age proxy and contemporary tusk evolution in African elephants.
Keywords: Anthropogenic impacts; evolution of morphology; hunting; inheritance of incisors; ivory; selection; tusk evolution; tusklessness.
Figures
Figure 1
The location of elephant populations sampled in 1966–1968 (Tsavo East and Mkomazi National Parks) and in 2005–2013 (Shimba hills National reserve, Narok and Ol Pejeta wildlife conservancies and Tsavo East and Tsavo West National Parks).
Figure 2
Predicting total tusk length from exposed tusk length in contemporary females (A, total tusk length = 23.73 + 1.159 × exposed tusk length_, R_ 2 adj = 0.956), and males (B, total tusk length = 20.05 + 1.294 × exposed tusk length, R 2 adj = 0.974).
Figure 3
Variation in tusk length as a function of shoulder height for the elephant samples collected in 1966 – 1968 (black) and 2005–2013 (red). Contemporary males (A) and females (B) born after 1995 and onwards and males (C), and females (D) born by 1970 (survivors) compared with male and female elephants of similar age sampled in 1966–1968. Lines of model fit are for visualization only.
Figure 4
Variation in tusk length as a function of tusk circumference at base in (A) male and (B) female African elephants from Tsavo National Park in 1966–1968 and 2005–2013. The black circles show data for the 1966–1968 tusk samples, and the red or gray circles show the 2005–2013 tusk samples.
Similar articles
- Ivory Harvesting Pressure on the Genome of the African Elephant: A Phenotypic Shift to Tusklessness.
Raubenheimer EJ, Miniggio HD. Raubenheimer EJ, et al. Head Neck Pathol. 2016 Sep;10(3):332-5. doi: 10.1007/s12105-016-0704-y. Epub 2016 Feb 26. Head Neck Pathol. 2016. PMID: 26920555 Free PMC article. Review. - An assessment of the maximum sustainable yield of ivory from African elephant populations.
Basson M, Beddington JR, May RM. Basson M, et al. Math Biosci. 1991 Apr;104(1):73-95. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(91)90031-d. Math Biosci. 1991. PMID: 1804457 - Tusklessness and tusk fractures in free-ranging African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana).
Steenkamp G, Ferreira SM, Bester MN. Steenkamp G, et al. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2007 Jun;78(2):75-80. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v78i2.294. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17941599 - Ivory poaching and the rapid evolution of tusklessness in African elephants.
Campbell-Staton SC, Arnold BJ, Gonçalves D, Granli P, Poole J, Long RA, Pringle RM. Campbell-Staton SC, et al. Science. 2021 Oct 22;374(6566):483-487. doi: 10.1126/science.abe7389. Epub 2021 Oct 21. Science. 2021. PMID: 34672738 - Elephant behaviour and conservation: social relationships, the effects of poaching, and genetic tools for management.
Archie EA, Chiyo PI. Archie EA, et al. Mol Ecol. 2012 Feb;21(3):765-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05237.x. Epub 2011 Aug 31. Mol Ecol. 2012. PMID: 21880086 Review.
Cited by
- Effect of the habitat and tusks on trunk grasping techniques in African savannah elephants.
Costes P, Soppelsa J, Houssin C, Boulinguez-Ambroise G, Pacou C, Gouat P, Cornette R, Pouydebat E. Costes P, et al. Ecol Evol. 2024 Apr 19;14(4):e11317. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11317. eCollection 2024 Apr. Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 38646004 Free PMC article. - Genetic rescue from protected areas is modulated by migration, hunting rate, and timing of harvest.
Lassis R, Festa-Bianchet M, Van de Walle J, Pelletier F. Lassis R, et al. Evol Appl. 2023 May 12;16(6):1105-1118. doi: 10.1111/eva.13554. eCollection 2023 Jun. Evol Appl. 2023. PMID: 37360026 Free PMC article. - Artificial selection in human-wildlife feeding interactions.
Griffin LL, Haigh A, Amin B, Faull J, Norman A, Ciuti S. Griffin LL, et al. J Anim Ecol. 2022 Sep;91(9):1892-1905. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13771. Epub 2022 Aug 4. J Anim Ecol. 2022. PMID: 35927829 Free PMC article. - Simulated poaching affects global connectivity and efficiency in social networks of African savanna elephants-An exemplar of how human disturbance impacts group-living species.
Wiśniewska M, Puga-Gonzalez I, Lee P, Moss C, Russell G, Garnier S, Sueur C. Wiśniewska M, et al. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 18;18(1):e1009792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009792. eCollection 2022 Jan. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022. PMID: 35041648 Free PMC article. - Molecular sexing of degraded DNA from elephants and mammoths: a genotyping assay relevant both to conservation biology and to paleogenetics.
Aznar-Cormano L, Bonnald J, Krief S, Guma N, Debruyne R. Aznar-Cormano L, et al. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 31;11(1):7227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86010-x. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33790303 Free PMC article.
References
- van Aarde, R. J. , and Jackson T. P.. 2007. Megaparks for metapopulations: addressing the causes of locally high elephant numbers in southern Africa. Biol. Conserv. 134:289–297.
- Abe, E. L. 1996. Tusklessness amongst the Queen Elizabeth National Park elephants, Uganda. Pachyderm 22:46–47.
- Alvesalo, L. , and Portin P.. 1969. The inheritance pattern of missing, peg‐shaped, and strongly mesio‐distally reduced upper lateral incisors. Acta Odontol. Scand. 27:563–575. - PubMed
- Alvesalo, L. , and Tigerstedt P. M. A.. 1974. Heritabilities of human tooth dimensions. Hereditas 77:311–318. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources