Lung cancer screening in a community setting: Characteristics, motivations, and attitudes of individuals being screened - PubMed (original) (raw)

Lung cancer screening in a community setting: Characteristics, motivations, and attitudes of individuals being screened

Margaret M Byrne et al. Health Psychol Open. 2019.

Abstract

We describe the characteristics of individuals being screened in community settings including factors influencing screening decisions and the level of information sought prior to screening. Individuals from two community-based radiology clinics (N = 27) were surveyed after screening. Screening efficacy and salience were the most important factors in screening decisions, whereas healthcare provider recommendations were rated not important. Half of participants reported no or little conversation about screening with their primary care provider, and 61.5 percent had not sought any information on screening. Individuals being screened in a community setting are unlikely to have sufficient information for an informed decision about screening.

Keywords: decision-making; early adoption; information; low-dose computed tomography; lung cancer screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.

Lung cancer screening discussions (n = 27).

Figure 2.

Evaluation of lung cancer screening decision (n = 27).

Similar articles

• What factors do patients consider most important in making lung cancer screening decisions? Findings from a demonstration project conducted in the Veterans Health Administration.
  Lillie SE, Fu SS, Fabbrini AE, Rice KL, Clothier B, Nelson DB, Doro EA, Moughrabieh MA, Partin MR. Lillie SE, et al. Lung Cancer. 2017 Feb;104:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Nov 29. Lung Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28212998
• Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Providers in New Mexico About Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.
  Hoffman RM, Sussman AL, Getrich CM, Rhyne RL, Crowell RE, Taylor KL, Reifler EJ, Wescott PH, Murrietta AM, Saeed AI, Mishra SI. Hoffman RM, et al. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul 9;12:E108. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150112. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015. PMID: 26160294 Free PMC article.
• Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems.
  Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, Coates RC, Lee NC, Mullen P, Corso P, Hutchinson AB, Hiatt R, Kerner J, George P, White C, Gandhi N, Saraiya M, Breslow R, Isham G, Teutsch SM, Hinman AR, Lawrence R; Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Briss P, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.012. Am J Prev Med. 2004. PMID: 14700715 Review.
• Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study.
  Kanodra NM, Pope C, Halbert CH, Silvestri GA, Rice LJ, Tanner NT. Kanodra NM, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1977-1982. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-286OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016. PMID: 27676369
• Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].
  Patnode CD, Perdue LA, Rossom RC, Rushkin MC, Redmond N, Thomas RG, Lin JS. Patnode CD, et al. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Feb. Report No.: 19-05257-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Feb. Report No.: 19-05257-EF-1. PMID: 32129963 Free Books & Documents. Review.

Cited by

• Participant factors associated with psychosocial impacts of lung cancer screening: A systematic review.
  McFadden K, Nickel B, Rankin NM, Li T, Jennett CJ, Sharman A, Quaife SL, Houssami N, Dodd RH. McFadden K, et al. Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(15):e70054. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70054. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 39096118 Free PMC article. Review.
• Patient Experience of Managing Adherence to Repeat Lung Cancer Screening.
  Gillespie C, Wiener RS, Clark JA. Gillespie C, et al. J Patient Exp. 2022 Sep 25;9:23743735221126146. doi: 10.1177/23743735221126146. eCollection 2022. J Patient Exp. 2022. PMID: 36187210 Free PMC article.
• Motivation is not enough: A qualitative study of lung cancer screening uptake in Australia to inform future implementation.
  Dunlop KLA, Marshall HM, Stone E, Sharman AR, Dodd RH, Rhee JJ, McCullough S, Rankin NM. Dunlop KLA, et al. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 30;17(9):e0275361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275361. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36178960 Free PMC article.
• Lung cancer screening: targeting the hard to reach-a review.
  Van Hal G, Diab Garcia P. Van Hal G, et al. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 May;10(5):2309-2322. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-525. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 34164279 Free PMC article. Review.
• State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States.
  Fedewa SA, Kazerooni EA, Studts JL, Smith RA, Bandi P, Sauer AG, Cotter M, Sineshaw HM, Jemal A, Silvestri GA. Fedewa SA, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Aug 2;113(8):1044-1052. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa170. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021. PMID: 33176362 Free PMC article.

References

1. 1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. New England Journal of Medicine 365: 395–409. - PMC - PubMed
2. 1. Ajzen I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.
3. 1. American Cancer Society (ACS) (2018) Cancer Facts & Figures. Atlanta, GA: ACS.
4. 1. Anastasi N, Lusher J. (2017) The impact of breast cancer awareness interventions on breast screening uptake among women in the United Kingdom: A systematic review. Journal of Health Psychology. Epub ahead of print 1 March. DOI: 10.1177/1359105317697812. - DOI - PubMed
5. 1. Becker MH. (ed.) (1974) The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education Monographs 2: 324–508.

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Atypon
  • Europe PubMed Central
  • PubMed Central