Cardiovascular risk assessment tools: A scoping review - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
. 2019 Nov;32(6):540-559.
doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.09.008. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
Affiliations
- PMID: 30661867
- DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.09.008
Review
Cardiovascular risk assessment tools: A scoping review
Jennifer Sacramento-Pacheco et al. Aust Crit Care. 2019 Nov.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this review was to describe cardiovascular risk (CVR) assessment methods and to identify evidence-based practice recommendations when dealing with population at risk of developing cardiovascular diseases.
Review methods and data sources: A literature review following the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodology was conducted. By using appropriate key terms, literature searches were conducted in PubMed, SciELO, Cochrane Library, Dialnet, ENFISPO, Medigraphic, ScienceDirect, Cuiden, and Lilacs databases. A complementary search on websites related to the area of interest was conducted. Articles published in English or Spanish in peer-review journals between 2010 and 2017. Critical appraisal for methodological quality was conducted. Data was extracted using ad-hoc tables and qualitatively synthesized.
Results: After eliminating duplicates, 55325 records remained, and 1432 records were selected for screening. Out of these, 88 full-text articles were selected for eligibility criteria, and finally, 67 studies were selected for this review, and 25 studies were selected for evidence synthesis. In total, 23 CVR assessment tools have been identified, pioneered by the Framingham study. Qualitative findings were grouped into four thematic areas: assessment tools and scores, CVR indicators, comparative models, and evidence-based recommendations.
Conclusions: It is necessary to adapt the instruments to the epidemiological reality of the population. The most appropriate way to estimate CVR is to choose the assessment tool that best suits individual conditions, accompanied by a comprehensive assessment of the patient. More research is required to determine a single, adequate, and reliable tool.
Keywords: Cardiovascular diseases; Cardiovascular risk; Cardiovascular risk assessment tools; Prevention of cardiovascular disease; Risk assessment; Scoping review.
Copyright © 2018 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
Allen D, Gillen E, Rixson L. Allen D, et al. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426 - Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with a severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Foguet-Boreu Q, Fernandez San Martin MI, Flores Mateo G, Zabaleta Del Olmo E, Ayerbe García-Morzon L, Perez-Piñar López M, Martin-López LM, Montes Hidalgo J, Violán C. Foguet-Boreu Q, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 12;16:141. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0833-6. BMC Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27176477 Free PMC article. Review. - Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
Callaghan A, Kendall G, Lock C, Mahony A, Payne J, Verrier L. Callaghan A, et al. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 27819973 - Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.
Flynn MA, McNeil DA, Maloff B, Mutasingwa D, Wu M, Ford C, Tough SC. Flynn MA, et al. Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x. Obes Rev. 2006. PMID: 16371076 Review. - Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
Colombini D, Occhipinti E. Colombini D, et al. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018. PMID: 29961081
Cited by
- Deep learning-based fundus image analysis for cardiovascular disease: a review.
Chikumba S, Hu Y, Luo J. Chikumba S, et al. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Nov 18;14:20406223231209895. doi: 10.1177/20406223231209895. eCollection 2023. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023. PMID: 38028950 Free PMC article. Review. - Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Spain: A Systematic Review.
Sacramento-Pacheco J, Sánchez-Gómez MB, Gómez-Salgado J, Novo-Muñoz MM, Duarte-Clíments G. Sacramento-Pacheco J, et al. J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 6;12(21):6944. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216944. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37959409 Free PMC article. Review. - Tools for Assessing Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Underserved Young Adult Populations: A Systematic Review.
Opoku-Acheampong AA, Rosenkranz RR, Adhikari K, Muturi N, Logan C, Kidd T. Opoku-Acheampong AA, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 17;18(24):13305. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413305. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34948914 Free PMC article. Review. - Factors Affecting the Intention to Modify Lifestyle in the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Group in Korea.
Shim J, Kim K. Shim J, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 22;9(5):496. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050496. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33922181 Free PMC article. - Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Young Adults through the Nursing Diagnosis: A Cross-Sectional Study among International University Students.
Duarte-Clíments G, Mauricio TF, Gómez-Salgado J, Moreira RP, Romero-Martín M, Sánchez-Gómez MB. Duarte-Clíments G, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 17;9(1):91. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010091. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33477383 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources