Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2019 Apr;291(1):112-118.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182082. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Affiliations
- PMID: 30694156
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182082
Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery
Randy C Miles et al. Radiology. 2019 Apr.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate readability of websites that are commonly accessed for information on breast lesions requiring surgery. Materials and Methods An internet search using three malignant and eight nonmalignant breast lesions that traditionally require lumpectomy or excisional biopsy as search terms was conducted to identify websites commonly accessed for patient information on breast lesions requiring surgery. Nine websites with information on breast diagnoses were identified based on search engine results for each breast lesion queried. Available patient-directed information was downloaded for each lesion from each website on May 15, 2018. Grade-level readability of downloaded content for each lesion was then determined by using generalized estimating equations, with observations nested within readability metrics from each website. Readability of associated terms breast biopsy, breast cancer, and breast surgery was also evaluated with the same method. Results were compared with American Medical Association (AMA) recommended readability parameters (sixth-grade reading level). All interval estimates were calculated for 95% confidence. Results Average grade level readability score of health information on breast lesions requiring surgery was 11.7, which exceeded the AMA parameters. Information on Wikipedia was written at the highest reading level (grade level readability score, 14.2), while information on the National Institutes of Health website ( http://cancer.gov ) was written at the lowest reading level (grade level readability score, 9.7). Educational materials on malignant breast lesions (grade level readability score, 12.3) were written at a higher reading level than were those on nonmalignant breast lesions (grade level readability score,11.4). Information on the terms breast biopsy (grade level readability score, 10.9), breast cancer (grade level readability score, 10.6), and breast surgery (grade level readability score, 11.1) were all written above a sixth-grade reading level. Conclusion Readability of current online resources on breast biopsy lesions traditionally requiring surgery may be too complex for the general public to comprehend, leading to misinformation and confusion. © RSNA, 2019 See also the editorial by Haygood in this issue.
Comment in
- Patient Literacy and Access to Radiology Information.
Haygood TM. Haygood TM. Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):119-120. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190007. Epub 2019 Jan 29. Radiology. 2019. PMID: 30694158 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials?
Miles RC, Choi P, Baird GL, Dibble EH, Lamb L, Garg M, Lehman C. Miles RC, et al. Acad Radiol. 2020 Oct;27(10):1400-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Dec 12. Acad Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31839567 - Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
Samuel D, Vilardo N, Isani SS, Kuo DYS, Gressel GM. Samuel D, et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):616-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 16. Gynecol Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31324452 - An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.
Prabhu AV, Kim C, Crihalmeanu T, Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, DeFrances MC, Trejo Bittar HE. Prabhu AV, et al. Hum Pathol. 2017 Jul;65:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 May 10. Hum Pathol. 2017. PMID: 28504209 - Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.
Williams AM, Muir KW, Rosdahl JA. Williams AM, et al. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 3;16:133. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0315-0. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27487960 Free PMC article. Review. - Readability of Trauma-Related Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Eltorai AE, P Thomas N, Yang H, Daniels AH, Born CT. Eltorai AE, et al. Trauma Mon. 2016 Feb 6;21(1):e20141. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.20141. eCollection 2016 Feb. Trauma Mon. 2016. PMID: 27218045 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials for Coronary Artery Calcium Scans and Implications for Health Disparities.
Rodriguez F, Ngo S, Baird G, Balla S, Miles R, Garg M. Rodriguez F, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e017372. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017372. Epub 2020 Aug 31. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32865121 Free PMC article. - Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT to Accurately Simplify Patient-centered Information about Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening.
Haver HL, Gupta AK, Ambinder EB, Bahl M, Oluyemi ET, Jeudy J, Yi PH. Haver HL, et al. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230086. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230086. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38305716 Free PMC article. - Readability of English, German, and Russian Disease-Related Wikipedia Pages: Automated Computational Analysis.
Gordejeva J, Zowalla R, Pobiruchin M, Wiesner M. Gordejeva J, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 16;24(5):e36835. doi: 10.2196/36835. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35576562 Free PMC article. - A mobile app for chronic disease self-management for individuals with low health literacy: A multisite randomized controlled clinical trial.
Ownby RL, Simonson M, Caballero J, Thomas-Purcell K, Davenport R, Purcell D, Ayala V, Gonzlez J, Patel N, Kondwani K. Ownby RL, et al. J Ageing Longev. 2024 Jun;4(2):51-71. doi: 10.3390/jal4020005. Epub 2024 Apr 30. J Ageing Longev. 2024. PMID: 39555133 Free PMC article. - Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.
Byrne J, Keogh S, Cullinane C, Razzaq Z, Redmond HP. Byrne J, et al. OTO Open. 2022 Oct 20;6(4):2473974X221133308. doi: 10.1177/2473974X221133308. eCollection 2022 Oct-Dec. OTO Open. 2022. PMID: 36311181 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical