Predictors of Gamblers Beliefs About Responsible Gambling Measures - PubMed (original) (raw)
Predictors of Gamblers Beliefs About Responsible Gambling Measures
Jonny Engebø et al. J Gambl Stud. 2019 Dec.
Abstract
Responsible gambling (RG) measures are methods aimed at reducing and preventing negative consequences associated with gambling. Some RG measures are set by authorities or gambling operators while others are available as features for gamblers to use themselves (e.g. budget tools where personal monetary limits are set prior to gambling). The present study is based on a general gambler population and investigates how RG measures with some specific RG features are assessed by the gamblers. The data was collected in 2013 and 2015. The samples were drawn from the Norwegian Population Registry. In total 9129 gamblers participated. Gamblers were asked to state to which degree they agreed that ten specific RG measures help or would help them controlling their gambling. Overall, between 35 and 42% neither agreed nor disagreed, but among those with an opinion, most agreed. A multiple regression analysis identified eleven variables as significant predictors of positive beliefs about RG measures: female gender, young age, playing random games only, being a moderate risk or problem gambler, reporting high impact from gambling advertisements as well as the personality traits agreeableness, openness and neuroticism. Playing low risk games only, reporting a high amount of spending on gambling and the personality trait extraversion were inversely related to positive beliefs about RG measures. The total explained variance was however only 7.1%. Positive beliefs about RG measures can relate to needs for external based countermeasures to minimize or reduce problems. Negative views may reflect a wish to play without obstacles, take risks or to trust in self-control.
Keywords: Gambling; Gambling problems; Harm reduction; Pre-commitment; Prevention; Responsible gambling.
Similar articles
- Gamblers' use of measures to prevent gambling problems and reduce harm.
Engebø J, Torsheim T, Pallesen S. Engebø J, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 27;13:857280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857280. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35966481 Free PMC article. - Gambling Responsibly: Who Does It and To What End?
Hing N, Sproston K, Tran K, Russell AM. Hing N, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2017 Mar;33(1):149-165. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9615-9. J Gambl Stud. 2017. PMID: 27150462 - Application of Health Belief Model to Practice of Responsible Gambling.
Tong KK, Chen JH, Wu AMS. Tong KK, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):1047-1062. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09871-y. J Gambl Stud. 2019. PMID: 31254140 - [Internet gambling: what are the risks?].
Bonnaire C. Bonnaire C. Encephale. 2012 Feb;38(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Apr 8. Encephale. 2012. PMID: 22381723 Review. French. - The Impact of Speed of Play in Gambling on Psychological and Behavioural Factors: A Critical Review.
Harris A, Griffiths MD. Harris A, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):393-412. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9701-7. J Gambl Stud. 2018. PMID: 28643152 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- What is known about population level programs designed to address gambling-related harm: rapid review of the evidence.
Clune S, Ratnaike D, White V, Donaldson A, Randle E, O'Halloran P, Lewis V. Clune S, et al. Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jun 18;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01032-8. Harm Reduct J. 2024. PMID: 38890632 Free PMC article. Review. - Effect of Responsible Gaming Policy and Practice on Casino Gaming Behavior.
Liu S, To WM, Huang GH. Liu S, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1061-1084. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10262-7. Epub 2023 Nov 14. J Gambl Stud. 2024. PMID: 37962802 - Gamblers' use of measures to prevent gambling problems and reduce harm.
Engebø J, Torsheim T, Pallesen S. Engebø J, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 27;13:857280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857280. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35966481 Free PMC article. - Regulatory Measures' Effect on Gambling Participation: Experiences From Norway.
Engebø J, Torsheim T, Pallesen S. Engebø J, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 30;12:672471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672471. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 34276444 Free PMC article. - Gamblers' Perception of the Playscan Risk Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Forsström D, Rozental A, Wiklund E, Carlbring P, Lindner P. Forsström D, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2022 Jun;38(2):591-606. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10043-0. Epub 2021 Jun 5. J Gambl Stud. 2022. PMID: 34091781 Free PMC article.
References
- J Gambl Stud. 2015 Dec;31(4):1715-34 - PubMed
- J Gambl Stud. 2014 Sep;30(3):697-712 - PubMed
- Dev Rev. 2008 Mar;28(1):78-106 - PubMed
- Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 23;8:227 - PubMed
- J Gambl Stud. 2011 Dec;27(4):685-700 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical