The Not-So-Dark Side of Materialism: Can Public Versus Private Contexts Make Materialists Less Eco-Unfriendly? - PubMed (original) (raw)

The Not-So-Dark Side of Materialism: Can Public Versus Private Contexts Make Materialists Less Eco-Unfriendly?

Luxiao Wang et al. Front Psychol. 2019.

Abstract

Materialism, a way of life characterized by pursuing possessions, image, and status, has always been looked upon as self-interested and unkind. Previous studies have widely verified that materialism has a negative impact on individuals' pro-environmental behaviors. The present research focused on whether the public (versus private) nature of a decision context will make materialists behave in more eco-friendly ways. In Study 1, the behavioral decision context (public vs. private) was manipulated to examine whether the relationship between materialism and pro-environmental behaviors would vary as a function of the situation. In Study 2, we manipulated materialism and contexts simultaneously to verify the hypothesis again. Findings in the two studies consistently revealed that public versus private contexts played a moderating role between materialism and pro-environmental behaviors. That is, in private, individuals with higher levels of materialism were less eco-friendly than those with lower levels of materialism, but the negative effect disappeared in public. We concluded with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of the research findings.

Keywords: impression management theory; materialism; private contexts; pro-environmental behaviors; public contexts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Relationship between materialism and deforestation rate as a function of decision contexts (public vs. private) in Study 1.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Relationship between materialism and number of acres cut as a function of decision contexts (public vs. private) in Study 1.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Watermarks used with public (A) and private (B) groups in Study 2.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Deforestation rate as a function of materialism and decision contexts (public vs. private) in Study 2.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Number of acres cut as a function of materialism and decision contexts (public vs. private) in Study 2.

References

    1. Andersson D., Nässén J. (2016). Should environmentalists be concerned about materialism? An analysis of attitudes, behaviours and greenhouse gas emissions. J. Environ. Psychol. 48, 1–11. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.08.002 -DOI
    1. Barclay P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 209–220. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.002 -DOI
    1. Barr S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: a U.K. case study of household waste management. Environ. Behav. 39, 435–473. 10.1177/0013916505283421 -DOI
    1. Bereczkei T., Birkas B., Kerekes Z. (2010). The presence of others, prosocial traits, Machiavellianism: a personality × situation approach. Soc. Psychol. 41, 238–245. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000032 -DOI
    1. Bereczkei T., Czibor A. (2014). Personality and situational factors differently influence high Mach and low Mach persons’ decisions in a social dilemma game. Personal. Individ. Differ. 64, 168–173. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.035 -DOI

LinkOut - more resources