Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake - PubMed (original) (raw)
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jul 2;30(1):67-77.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 16.
Alexis Ayuketah 2, Robert Brychta 2, Hongyi Cai 2, Thomas Cassimatis 2, Kong Y Chen 2, Stephanie T Chung 2, Elise Costa 2, Amber Courville 3, Valerie Darcey 2, Laura A Fletcher 2, Ciaran G Forde 4, Ahmed M Gharib 2, Juen Guo 2, Rebecca Howard 2, Paule V Joseph 5, Suzanne McGehee 2, Ronald Ouwerkerk 2, Klaudia Raisinger 3, Irene Rozga 2, Michael Stagliano 2, Mary Walter 2, Peter J Walter 2, Shanna Yang 3, Megan Zhou 2
Affiliations
- PMID: 31105044
- PMCID: PMC7946062
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008
Randomized Controlled Trial
Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake
Kevin D Hall et al. Cell Metab. 2019.
Erratum in
- Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake.
Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, Cai H, Cassimatis T, Chen KY, Chung ST, Costa E, Courville A, Darcey V, Fletcher LA, Forde CG, Gharib AM, Guo J, Howard R, Joseph PV, McGehee S, Ouwerkerk R, Raisinger K, Rozga I, Stagliano M, Walter M, Walter PJ, Yang S, Zhou M. Hall KD, et al. Cell Metab. 2019 Jul 2;30(1):226. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.020. Cell Metab. 2019. PMID: 31269427 Free PMC article. No abstract available. - Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake.
Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, Cai H, Cassimatis T, Chen KY, Chung ST, Costa E, Courville A, Darcey V, Fletcher LA, Forde CG, Gharib AM, Guo J, Howard R, Joseph PV, McGehee S, Ouwerkerk R, Raisinger K, Rozga I, Stagliano M, Walter M, Walter PJ, Yang S, Zhou M. Hall KD, et al. Cell Metab. 2020 Oct 6;32(4):690. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.014. Cell Metab. 2020. PMID: 33027677 No abstract available.
Abstract
We investigated whether ultra-processed foods affect energy intake in 20 weight-stable adults, aged (mean ± SE) 31.2 ± 1.6 years and BMI = 27 ± 1.5 kg/m2. Subjects were admitted to the NIH Clinical Center and randomized to receive either ultra-processed or unprocessed diets for 2 weeks immediately followed by the alternate diet for 2 weeks. Meals were designed to be matched for presented calories, energy density, macronutrients, sugar, sodium, and fiber. Subjects were instructed to consume as much or as little as desired. Energy intake was greater during the ultra-processed diet (508 ± 106 kcal/day; p = 0.0001), with increased consumption of carbohydrate (280 ± 54 kcal/day; p < 0.0001) and fat (230 ± 53 kcal/day; p = 0.0004), but not protein (-2 ± 12 kcal/day; p = 0.85). Weight changes were highly correlated with energy intake (r = 0.8, p < 0.0001), with participants gaining 0.9 ± 0.3 kg (p = 0.009) during the ultra-processed diet and losing 0.9 ± 0.3 kg (p = 0.007) during the unprocessed diet. Limiting consumption of ultra-processed foods may be an effective strategy for obesity prevention and treatment.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03407053.
Keywords: diet quality; energy balance; energy intake; processed food; weight gain; weight loss.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Interests
CG Forde has received reimbursement for speaking at conferences sponsored by companies selling nutritional products, serves on the scientific advisory council for Kerry Taste and Nutrition, and is part of an academic consortium that has received research funding from Abbott Nutrition, Nestec, and Danone. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Figure 1.. Overview of the study design.
Twenty adults were confined to the metabolic ward at the NIH Clinical Center. Every week, subjects spent one day residing in a respiratory chamber to measure energy expenditure, respiratory quotient, and sleeping energy expenditure. Average energy expenditure during each diet period was measured by the doubly labeled water (DLW) method. Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and liver fat was measured by magnetic resonance imaging/spectroscopy (MRI/MRS).
Figure 2.. Ad libitum food intake, appetite scores, and eating rate.
A) Energy intake was consistently higher during the ultra-processed diet. B) Average energy intake was increased during the ultra-processed diet because of increased intake of carbohydrate and fat, but not protein. C) Energy consumed at breakfast and lunch was significantly greater during the ultra-processed diet, but energy consumed at dinner and snacks was not significantly different between the diets. D) Both diets were rated similarly on visual analogue scales (VAS) with respect to pleasantness and familiarity. E) Appetitive measures were not significantly different between the diets. F) Meal eating rate was significantly greater during the ultra-processed diet.
Figure 3.. Body weight and composition changes.
A) The ultra-processed diet led to increased body weight over time whereas the unprocessed diet led to progressive weight loss. B) Differences in body weight change between the ultra-processed and unprocessed diets were highly correlated with the corresponding energy intake differences. C) Body fat mass increased over time with the ultra-processed diet and decreased with the unprocessed diet. D) Body weight, body fat, and fat-free mass changes between the beginning and end of each diet period..
Figure 4.. Glucose tolerance and continuous glucose monitoring.
A) Glucose concentrations following a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was not significantly different between the diets. B) Insulin concentrations following the OGTT were not significantly different between the diets. C) Continuous glucose monitoring throughout the study did not detect significant differences in average glucose concentrations or glycemic variability as measured by the coefficient of variation (CV) of glucose.
Comment in
- Freshly Prepared Meals and Not Ultra-Processed Foods.
Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac JC, Levy RB, Louzada MLC, Jaime PC. Monteiro CA, et al. Cell Metab. 2019 Jul 2;30(1):5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 20. Cell Metab. 2019. PMID: 31230986 No abstract available. - Ultra-Processed Food and Obesity: The Pitfalls of Extrapolation from Short Studies.
Ludwig DS, Astrup A, Bazzano LA, Ebbeling CB, Heymsfield SB, King JC, Willett WC. Ludwig DS, et al. Cell Metab. 2019 Jul 2;30(1):3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 20. Cell Metab. 2019. PMID: 31230987 No abstract available. - Challenges Interpreting Inpatient and Outpatient Human Nutrition Studies.
Hall KD. Hall KD. Cell Metab. 2019 Aug 6;30(2):227-228. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 1. Cell Metab. 2019. PMID: 31272848 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Associations between Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods and Intake of Nutrients Related to Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases in Mexico.
Marrón-Ponce JA, Flores M, Cediel G, Monteiro CA, Batis C. Marrón-Ponce JA, et al. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Nov;119(11):1852-1865. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Jun 28. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019. PMID: 31262695 - Texture-based differences in eating rate influence energy intake for minimally processed and ultra-processed meals.
Teo PS, Lim AJ, Goh AT, R J, Choy JYM, McCrickerd K, Forde CG. Teo PS, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jul 6;116(1):244-254. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac068. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022. PMID: 35285882 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Effect of a plant-based, low-fat diet versus an animal-based, ketogenic diet on ad libitum energy intake.
Hall KD, Guo J, Courville AB, Boring J, Brychta R, Chen KY, Darcey V, Forde CG, Gharib AM, Gallagher I, Howard R, Joseph PV, Milley L, Ouwerkerk R, Raisinger K, Rozga I, Schick A, Stagliano M, Torres S, Walter M, Walter P, Yang S, Chung ST. Hall KD, et al. Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):344-353. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01209-1. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Nat Med. 2021. PMID: 33479499 Clinical Trial. - Dietary fiber and weight regulation.
Howarth NC, Saltzman E, Roberts SB. Howarth NC, et al. Nutr Rev. 2001 May;59(5):129-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb07001.x. Nutr Rev. 2001. PMID: 11396693 Review. - Beyond ultra-processed: considering the future role of food processing in human health.
Forde CG. Forde CG. Proc Nutr Soc. 2023 Sep;82(3):406-418. doi: 10.1017/S0029665123003014. Epub 2023 Jun 1. Proc Nutr Soc. 2023. PMID: 37654079 Review.
Cited by
- Ultra-processed food consumption is associated with increase in fat mass and decrease in lean mass in Brazilian women: A cohort study.
Rudakoff LCS, Magalhães EIDS, Viola PCAF, de Oliveira BR, da Silva Coelho CCN, Bragança MLBM, Arruda SPM, Cardoso VC, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, Levy RB, da Silva AAM. Rudakoff LCS, et al. Front Nutr. 2022 Oct 14;9:1006018. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1006018. eCollection 2022. Front Nutr. 2022. PMID: 36313106 Free PMC article. - Manipulation of Dietary Amino Acids Prevents and Reverses Obesity in Mice Through Multiple Mechanisms That Modulate Energy Homeostasis.
Ruocco C, Ragni M, Rossi F, Carullo P, Ghini V, Piscitelli F, Cutignano A, Manzo E, Ioris RM, Bontems F, Tedesco L, Greco CM, Pino A, Severi I, Liu D, Ceddia RP, Ponzoni L, Tenori L, Rizzetto L, Scholz M, Tuohy K, Bifari F, Di Marzo V, Luchinat C, Carruba MO, Cinti S, Decimo I, Condorelli G, Coppari R, Collins S, Valerio A, Nisoli E. Ruocco C, et al. Diabetes. 2020 Nov;69(11):2324-2339. doi: 10.2337/db20-0489. Epub 2020 Aug 10. Diabetes. 2020. PMID: 32778569 Free PMC article. - Addressing Challenges with the Categorization of Foods Processed at Home: A Pilot Methodology to Inform Consumer-Facing Guidance.
Bleiweiss-Sande R, Bailey CP, Sacheck J, Goldberg JP. Bleiweiss-Sande R, et al. Nutrients. 2020 Aug 8;12(8):2373. doi: 10.3390/nu12082373. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32784400 Free PMC article. - Association Between Childhood Consumption of Ultraprocessed Food and Adiposity Trajectories in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Birth Cohort.
Chang K, Khandpur N, Neri D, Touvier M, Huybrechts I, Millett C, Vamos EP. Chang K, et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Sep 1;175(9):e211573. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1573. Epub 2021 Sep 7. JAMA Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 34125152 Free PMC article.
References
- Baer DJ, Rumpler WV, Miles CW, and Fahey GC Jr. (1997). Dietary fiber decreases the metabolizable energy content and nutrient digestibility of mixed diets fed to humans. J Nutr 127, 579–586. - PubMed
- Black AE, and Cole TJ (2000). Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 386–394. - PubMed
- Blatt H (2008). America’s food: What you don’t know about what you eat. (Cambridge: The MIT press; ).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources