Use of Consumer Protection Tools on Internet Gambling Sites: Customer Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Use - PubMed (original) (raw)
Use of Consumer Protection Tools on Internet Gambling Sites: Customer Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Use
Sally M Gainsbury et al. J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar.
Abstract
Internet gambling has been widely legalised in recognition of its capacity to, and the importance of, providing consumer protection tools to prevent and minimise gambling-related harms. Most licensed Internet gambling sites are required to provide consumer protection tools, including activity statements, deposit limits, and time-outs (temporary self-exclusion). However, few Internet gambling customers engage with the tools. An online survey of 564 customers of Australian Internet gambling sites aimed to understand the extent to which consumer protection tools are used, characteristics of those using these tools, and the perceptions and attitudes towards tool use, including barriers to use. Most participants were aware of the tools and had accessed activity statements; few had used deposit limits (24.5%) or time-outs (8.1%) but use of these restrictive tools was higher among those at-risk of gambling problems. Satisfaction with tools was generally high among users and tools were mostly used as intended; however, only moderate changes in behaviour were reported. Participants predominately did not use the restrictive tools as they did not see these as relevant for them, and they were perceived to be intended for people with gambling problems. The findings are important to drive necessary improvements to consumer protection efforts including efforts to encourage perception that tools are relevant for all customers. Changes to current practice, including terminology and promotion of tools, are needed by Internet gambling operators and policy makers to improve the utilisation and effectiveness of consumer protection tools to enable sustainable gambling among the broader cohort of Internet gamblers.
Keywords: Harm minimisation; Online gambling; Prevention; Responsible gambling; Self-exclusion; Voluntary pre-commitment.
Similar articles
- Understanding use of consumer protection tools among Internet gambling customers: Utility of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Theory of Reasoned Action.
Procter L, Angus DJ, Blaszczynski A, Gainsbury SM. Procter L, et al. Addict Behav. 2019 Dec;99:106050. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106050. Epub 2019 Jul 18. Addict Behav. 2019. PMID: 31522130 - Patterns and correlates of consumer protection tool use by Australian online gambling customers.
Heirene RM, Vanichkina DP, Gainsbury SM. Heirene RM, et al. Psychol Addict Behav. 2021 Dec;35(8):974-984. doi: 10.1037/adb0000761. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Psychol Addict Behav. 2021. PMID: 34166002 - Public attitudes towards gambling product harm and harm reduction strategies: an online study of 16-88 year olds in Victoria, Australia.
Thomas SL, Randle M, Bestman A, Pitt H, Bowe SJ, Cowlishaw S, Daube M. Thomas SL, et al. Harm Reduct J. 2017 Jul 25;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0173-y. Harm Reduct J. 2017. PMID: 28743300 Free PMC article. - [Internet gambling: what are the risks?].
Bonnaire C. Bonnaire C. Encephale. 2012 Feb;38(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Apr 8. Encephale. 2012. PMID: 22381723 Review. French. - Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling.
Gainsbury SM. Gainsbury SM. J Gambl Stud. 2014 Jun;30(2):229-51. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9362-0. J Gambl Stud. 2014. PMID: 23338831 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Gambling Harm-Minimisation Tools and Their Impact on Gambling Behaviour: A Review of the Empirical Evidence.
Riley BJ, Oakes J, Lawn S. Riley BJ, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 30;21(8):998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21080998. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39200609 Free PMC article. Review. - Motivational telephone intervention to risk gamblers by a state-owned gambling operator in Sweden.
Hakansson A, Franklin K, Dahlström M, Lyckberg A. Hakansson A, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 30;15:1343733. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1343733. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38352656 Free PMC article. - 'We are not the ones to blame'. Gamblers' and providers' appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany.
Kraus L, Bickl A, Sedlacek L, Schwarzkopf L, Örnberg JC, Loy JK. Kraus L, et al. BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;23(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15117-9. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36788494 Free PMC article. - Responsible gambling through a motivational telephone intervention to high-risk gamblers - An evaluation of user satisfaction and subjective intervention effects.
Håkansson A, Franklin K, Dahlström M, Lyckberg A. Håkansson A, et al. Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 30;13:917216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917216. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36532977 Free PMC article. - How structural changes in online gambling are shaping the contemporary experiences and behaviours of online gamblers: an interview study.
Hing N, Smith M, Rockloff M, Thorne H, Russell AMT, Dowling NA, Breen H. Hing N, et al. BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):1620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14019-6. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36028827 Free PMC article.
References
- Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):973-986 - PubMed
- J Gambl Stud. 2016 Sep;32(3):889-904 - PubMed
- J Gambl Stud. 2015 Dec;31(4):1715-34 - PubMed
- Eur J Public Health. 2015 Aug;25(4):723-8 - PubMed
- Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 28;7:1875 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical