Reviewing evidence of the clinical effectiveness of commercially available antivenoms in sub-Saharan Africa identifies the need for a multi-centre, multi-antivenom clinical trial - PubMed (original) (raw)

Reviewing evidence of the clinical effectiveness of commercially available antivenoms in sub-Saharan Africa identifies the need for a multi-centre, multi-antivenom clinical trial

Julien Potet et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019.

Abstract

Background: Snakebite envenoming kills more than more than 20,000 people in Sub-Saharan Africa every year. Poorly regulated markets have been inundated with low-price, low-quality antivenoms. This review aimed to systematically collect and analyse the clinical data on all antivenom products now available in markets of sub-Saharan Africa.

Methodology/principal findings: Our market analysis identified 12 polyspecific and 4 monospecific antivenom products in African markets. Our search strategy was first based on a systematic search of publication databases, followed by manual searches and discussions with experts. All types of data, including programmatic data, were eligible. All types of publications were eligible, including grey literature. Cohorts of less than 10 patients were excluded. 26 publications met the inclusion criteria. Many publications had to be excluded because clinical outcomes were not clearly linked to a specific product. Our narrative summaries present product-specific clinical data in terms of safety and effectiveness against the different species and envenoming syndromes. Three products (EchiTabPlus, EchiTabG, SAIMR-Echis-monovalent) were found to have been tested in robust clinical studies and found effective against envenoming caused by the West African carpet viper (Echis ocellatus). Four products (Inoserp-Panafricain, Fav-Afrique, SAIMR-Polyvalent, Antivipmyn-Africa) were found to have been evaluated only in observational single-arm studies, with varying results. For nine other products, there are either no data in the public domain, or only negative data suggesting a lack of effectiveness.

Conclusions/significance: Clinical data vary among the different antivenom products currently in African markets. Some products are available commercially although they have been found to lack effectiveness. The World Health Organization should strengthen its capacity to assess antivenom products, support antivenom manufacturers, and assist African countries and international aid organizations in selecting appropriate quality antivenoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1

Fig 1. Search strategy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gutierrez JM., Calvete JJ., Habib AG., et al. (2017), Snakebite envenoming. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 3: 17063 10.1038/nrdp.2017.63 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO (2010), Guidelines for the prevention and clinical management of snakebite in Africa. Brazzaville: World Health Organization
    1. Theakston RDG., Warrell DA. (2000), Crisis in snake antivenom supply for Africa. The Lancet. Vol. 356 (9247): 2104 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74319-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warrell DA. (2008), Unscrupulous marketing of snake bit antivenoms in Africa and Papua New Guinea: chosing the right product–‘what’s in a name?’ Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 102 (5): 397–99. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams DJ., Faiz MA., Abela-Ridder B., Ainsworth S., Bulfone TC., Nickerson AD., et al. (2019) Strategy for a globally coordinated response to a priority neglected tropical disease: Snakebite envenoming. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol. 13(2): e0007059 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007059 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

LinkOut - more resources