A Multifactorial Approach to Overuse Running Injuries: A 1-Year Prospective Study - PubMed (original) (raw)

A Multifactorial Approach to Overuse Running Injuries: A 1-Year Prospective Study

Sara C Winter et al. Sports Health. 2020 May/Jun.

Abstract

Background: Because of the complex and multifaceted nature of running injuries, a multifactorial approach when investigating running injuries is required.

Hypothesis: Compared with uninjured runners, injured runners would exhibit different running biomechanics, display more fatigue changes, and would run a greater weekly running volume; more injured runners would also report having a previous injury.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Level of evidence: Level 4.

Methods: At commencement of the study, data were collected on demographics, anthropometrics, training history, previous injury history, and center-of-mass accelerations during a long-distance overground run. Participants completed weekly training diaries and were monitored for 1 year for an injury.

Results: A total of 76 runners completed the study, with 39 (22 male; 17 female) reporting an injury. Compared with male uninjured runners, male injured runners were heavier and ran a greater weekly distance. Male runners (injured and uninjured) exhibited increases in mediolateral center-of-mass accelerations during the run. Compared with female uninjured runners, female injured runners were heavier, ran with longer flight times and lower step frequencies, and more of them had reported an injury in the previous year and had increased speed training in the weeks prior to injury. Over 60% of male injured runners and over 50% of female injured runners had increased their weekly running distance by >30% between consecutive weeks at least once in the 4 weeks prior to injury.

Conclusion: Factors that may be related to injury for male runners include being heavier, running a greater weekly distance, and exhibiting fatigue changes in mediolateral center-of-mass accelerations. Factors that may be related to injury for female runners include being heavier, having an injury in the previous year, running with longer flight times and lower step frequencies, and increasing speed training prior to injury. Increases in weekly running distance in 1 consecutive week (particularly >30%) needs to be monitored in training, and this along with the other factors found may have contributed to injury development.

Clinical relevance: This study found that multiple factors are related to running injuries and that some factors are sex specific. The findings can aid in injury prevention and management.

Keywords: fatigue; injury; overuse; running; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest in the development and publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Percentage increases in weekly training distance between weeks 1 and 2, weeks 2 and 3, and weeks 3 and 4 prior to injury for male injured runners and female injured runners.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alt T, Heinrish K, Funken J, Potthast W. Lower extremity kinematics of athletics curve sprinting. J Sports Sci. 2015;33:552-560. - PubMed
    1. Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods. 2005;37:379-384. - PubMed
    1. Bigelow E, Elvin N, Elvin A, Arnoczky S. Peak impact accelerations during track and treadmill running. J Appl Biomech. 2013;29:639-644. - PubMed
    1. Buist I, Bredeweg S, Lemmink K, van Mechelen W, Diercks R. Predictors of running-related injuries in novice runners enrolled in a systematic training program: a prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):273-280. - PubMed
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources