The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit - PubMed (original) (raw)
The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit
J D Fisk et al. Exp Brain Res. 1988.
Abstract
Groups of patients suffering from unilateral damage to the left or right cerebral hemisphere were compared to a group of age-matched normal controls in a visually guided pointing task. Subjects were required to reach quickly and accurately to small visual targets as soon as they appeared on the screen in front of them. All reaches, which were quite unrestricted, were videotaped by rotary-shutter cameras and analyzed by a computer-assisted system which allowed analysis of the kinematic parameters of the movement in three-dimensional space. The groups were compared on the basis of their latency to initiate a reaching movement, the accuracy with which they achieved the target's position, and various measures derived from the instantaneous velocity of the movement. Both patient groups were found to be less accurate than controls and to require more time after the target was illuminated to complete the reach. But while the right-hemisphere group took longer to initiate a reach, the kinematic parameters of the movements they produced did not differ from those of the control group. In contrast, the left-hemisphere group did not differ from the control group in the time required to initiate a reaching movement but did require a greater period of time to execute the reach once it had been initiated. It is suggested that the right hemisphere group were deficient in the speed with which they could determine the spatial position of the target, while the left hemisphere group were deficient in their ability to select an appropriate motor program to achieve the target position and/or to monitor the movement and update the motor program as it was being executed.
Similar articles
- The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space.
Fisk JD, Goodale MA. Fisk JD, et al. Exp Brain Res. 1985;60(1):159-78. doi: 10.1007/BF00237028. Exp Brain Res. 1985. PMID: 4043274 - Hemispheric specialization in the co-ordination of arm and trunk movements during pointing in patients with unilateral brain damage.
Esparza DY, Archambault PS, Winstein CJ, Levin MF. Esparza DY, et al. Exp Brain Res. 2003 Feb;148(4):488-97. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1325-0. Epub 2002 Dec 21. Exp Brain Res. 2003. PMID: 12582832 - Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching.
Haaland KY, Prestopnik JL, Knight RT, Lee RR. Haaland KY, et al. Brain. 2004 May;127(Pt 5):1145-58. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh133. Epub 2004 Mar 19. Brain. 2004. PMID: 15033898 - [Perception in space. Visual aspects of space perception].
Viader F. Viader F. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1995 Aug-Sep;151(8-9):466-73. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1995. PMID: 8578066 Review. French. - Action control in visual neglect.
Coulthard E, Parton A, Husain M. Coulthard E, et al. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(13):2717-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.004. Epub 2005 Dec 20. Neuropsychologia. 2006. PMID: 16368117 Review.
Cited by
- Waterloo Handedness Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version.
Aloraini SM. Aloraini SM. Occup Ther Int. 2022 Oct 12;2022:3026415. doi: 10.1155/2022/3026415. eCollection 2022. Occup Ther Int. 2022. PMID: 36304079 Free PMC article. - Interlimb differences in coordination of unsupported reaching movements.
Schaffer JE, Sainburg RL. Schaffer JE, et al. Neuroscience. 2017 May 14;350:54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.025. Epub 2017 Mar 24. Neuroscience. 2017. PMID: 28344068 Free PMC article. - Hemispheric Asymmetries in Radial Line Bisection: Role of Retinotopic and Spatiotopic Factors.
Chieffi S, Messina G, Villano I, Messina A, Ilardi CR, Monda M, Salerno M, Sessa F, Mollica MP, Cavaliere G, Trinchese G, Cimmino F, Murabito P, Catapano A, Monda V. Chieffi S, et al. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02200. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30483201 Free PMC article. - Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion.
Bonda E, Petrides M, Ostry D, Evans A. Bonda E, et al. J Neurosci. 1996 Jun 1;16(11):3737-44. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-11-03737.1996. J Neurosci. 1996. PMID: 8642416 Free PMC article. - The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping.
Stone KD, Gonzalez CL. Stone KD, et al. Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;6:1403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01403. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26441777 Free PMC article. Review.
References
- Brain Res. 1978 Jan 13;139(2):309-26 - PubMed
- Exp Brain Res. 1983;51(2):247-60 - PubMed
- Exp Brain Res. 1985;60(1):159-78 - PubMed
- Brain. 1972;95(1):49-60 - PubMed
- Cortex. 1973 Dec;9(4):346-54 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical