Human Infection Challenge Studies: a Test for the Social Value Criterion of Research Ethics - PubMed (original) (raw)
Human Infection Challenge Studies: a Test for the Social Value Criterion of Research Ethics
Nicholas G Evans. mSphere. 2020.
Abstract
Human infection challenge studies involving the intentional infection of research participants with a disease-causing agent have recently been suggested as a means to speed up the search for a vaccine for the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Calls for challenge studies, however, rely on the expected social value of these studies. This value represents more than the simple possibility that a successful study will lead to the rapid development and dissemination of vaccines but also some expectation that this will actually occur. I show how this expectation may not be realistic in the current political moment and offer potential ways to make sure that any challenge trials that arise actually achieve their goals.
Keywords: COVID-19; challenge studies; coronavirus; global health; research ethics.
Copyright © 2020 Evans.
References
- Shah SK, Miller FG, Darton TC, Duenas D, Emerson C, Lynch HF, Jamrozik E, Jecker NS, Kamuya D, Kapulu M, Kimmelman J, MacKay D, Memoli MJ, Murphy SC, Palacios R, Richie TL, Roestenberg M, Saxena A, Saylor K, Selgelid MJ, Vaswani V, Rid A. 2020. Ethics of controlled human infection to address COVID-19. Science 368:832–834. doi: 10.1126/science.abc1076. -DOI -PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical