Dietary intake of total, animal, and plant proteins and risk of all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies - PubMed (original) (raw)

Meta-Analysis

Dietary intake of total, animal, and plant proteins and risk of all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Sina Naghshi et al. BMJ. 2020.

Abstract

Objective: To examine and quantify the potential dose-response relation between intake of total, animal, and plant protein and the risk of mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science until December 2019, and references of retrieved relevant articles.

Study selection: Prospective cohort studies that reported the risk estimates for all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality in adults aged 18 or older.

Data synthesis: Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals for the highest versus lowest categories of protein intake and to incorporate variation between studies. Linear and non-linear dose-response analyses were done to evaluate the dose-response relations between protein intake and mortality.

Results: 32 prospective cohort studies were included in the systematic review and 31 in the meta-analysis. During the follow-up period of 3.5 to 32 years, 113 039 deaths (16 429‬ from cardiovascular disease and 22 303‬ from cancer) occurred among 715 128 participants. Intake of total protein was associated with a lower risk of all cause mortality (pooled effect size 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.99, I2=58.4%, P<0.001). Intake of plant protein was significantly associated with a lower risk of all cause mortality (pooled effect size 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 0.97, I2=57.5%, P=0.003) and cardiovascular disease mortality (pooled hazard ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 0.96, I2=63.7%, P=0.001), but not with cancer mortality. Intake of total and animal protein was not significantly associated with risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality. A dose-response analysis showed a significant inverse dose-response association between intake of plant protein and all cause mortality (P=0.05 for non-linearity). An additional 3% energy from plant proteins a day was associated with a 5% lower risk of death from all causes.

Conclusions: Higher intake of total protein was associated with a lower risk of all cause mortality, and intake of plant protein was associated with a lower risk of all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. Replacement of foods high in animal protein with plant protein sources could be associated with longevity.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi\_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the Research Council of School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisation that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1

Fig 1

Flow diagram of study selection

Fig 2

Fig 2

Forest plot for association between protein intake and risk of all cause mortality in adults aged 19 or older, expressed as comparison between highest and lowest categories of protein intake. Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random effects analysis

Fig 3

Fig 3

Forest plot for association between protein intake and risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in adults aged 19 or older, expressed as comparison between highest and lowest categories of protein intake. Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random effects analysis

Fig 4

Fig 4

Forest plot for association between protein intake and risk of cancer mortality in adults aged 19 or older, expressed as comparison between highest and lowest categories of protein intake. Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random effects analysis

Fig 5

Fig 5

Non-linear dose-response association of intakes of total, animal, and plant protein (based on percentage of kcal/day (1 kcal=4.18 kJ=0.00418 MJ) with risk of mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer in adults aged 19 or older. Dietary intake of protein was modelled with restricted cubic splines in a multivariate random effects dose-response model. Black line indicates the linear model; solid purple line indicates the spline model; dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals. ES=effect size

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization NCD mortality and morbidity. World Health Organisation, 2016.
    1. Simpson SJ, Raubenheimer D. Perspective: tricks of the trade. Nature 2014;508:S66. 10.1038/508S66a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solon-Biet SM, McMahon AC, Ballard JWO, et al. The ratio of macronutrients, not caloric intake, dictates cardiometabolic health, aging, and longevity in ad libitum-fed mice. Cell Metab 2014;19:418-30. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.02.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shan Z, Rehm CD, Rogers G, et al. Trends in dietary carbohydrate, protein, and fat intake and diet quality among US adults, 1999-2016. JAMA 2019;322:1178-87. 10.1001/jama.2019.13771. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Lemmens SG, Westerterp KR. Dietary protein - its role in satiety, energetics, weight loss and health. Br J Nutr 2012;108(Suppl 2):S105-12. 10.1017/S0007114512002589. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources