Do We Trust the Crowd? Effects of Crowdsourcing on Perceived Credibility of Online Health Information - PubMed (original) (raw)
Do We Trust the Crowd? Effects of Crowdsourcing on Perceived Credibility of Online Health Information
Yan Huang et al. Health Commun. 2022 Jan.
Abstract
Crowdsourcing websites such as Wikipedia have become go-to places for health information. To what extent do we trust such health content that is generated by other Internet users? Will it make a difference if such entries are curated by medical professionals? Does the affordance of crowdsourcing make users feel like they themselves could be contributors, and does that influence their credibility judgments? We explored these questions with a 2 (Crowdsourcing: absence vs. presence) × 2 (Professional source: absence vs. presence) × 2 (Message: sunscreen vs. milk) between-subjects experiment (N = 189). Two indirect paths for crowdsourcing effects were found. The crowd-as-source path suggests that crowdsourcing negatively affects content credibility through decreased source trustworthiness and information completeness. In contrast, the self-as-source path indicates that crowdsourcing elevates source trustworthiness via heightened interactivity and sense of control. Although the additional professional source raises perceived gatekeeping on the site, it does not have substantial influence on credibility judgments. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
Similar articles
- Effects of Positive Language and Profession on Trustworthiness and Credibility in Online Health Advice: Experimental Study.
König L, Jucks R. König L, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 10;22(3):e16685. doi: 10.2196/16685. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32154786 Free PMC article. - Perceived truth of statements and simulated social media postings: an experimental investigation of source credibility, repeated exposure, and presentation format.
Nadarevic L, Reber R, Helmecke AJ, Köse D. Nadarevic L, et al. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Nov 11;5(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00251-4. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020. PMID: 33175284 Free PMC article. - Crowdsourcing citation-screening in a mixed-studies systematic review: a feasibility study.
Noel-Storr AH, Redmond P, Lamé G, Liberati E, Kelly S, Miller L, Dooley G, Paterson A, Burt J. Noel-Storr AH, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01271-4. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021. PMID: 33906604 Free PMC article. - Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.
Sbaffi L, Rowley J. Sbaffi L, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 19;19(6):e218. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7579. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28630033 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- A Transgender Health Information Resource: Participatory Design Study.
Morse B, Soares A, Kwan BM, Allen M, Lee RS, Desanto K, Holliman BD, Ytell K, Schilling LM. Morse B, et al. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jun 15;10:e42382. doi: 10.2196/42382. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023. PMID: 37318836 Free PMC article. - Student usage of open educational resources and social media at a Sri Lanka Medical School.
Hettige S, Dasanayaka E, Ediriweera DS. Hettige S, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03106-2. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35022011 Free PMC article. - Reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among African Americans: the effects of narratives, character's self-persuasion, and trust in science.
Huang Y, Green MC. Huang Y, et al. J Behav Med. 2023 Apr;46(1-2):290-302. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00303-8. Epub 2022 Mar 19. J Behav Med. 2023. PMID: 35305206 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources