The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions

Madeleine Goumas et al. Front Psychol. 2020.

Abstract

Humans have a profound effect on the planet's ecosystems, and unprecedented rates of human population growth and urbanization have brought wild animals into increasing contact with people. For many species, appropriate responses toward humans are likely to be critical to survival and reproductive success. Although numerous studies have investigated the impacts of human activity on biodiversity and species distributions, relatively few have examined the effects of humans on the behavioral responses of animals during human-wildlife encounters, and the cognitive processes underpinning those responses. Furthermore, while humans often present a significant threat to animals, the presence or behavior of people may be also associated with benefits, such as food rewards. In scenarios where humans vary in their behavior, wild animals would be expected to benefit from the ability to discriminate between dangerous, neutral and rewarding people. Additionally, individual differences in cognitive and behavioral phenotypes and past experiences with humans may affect animals' ability to exploit human-dominated environments and respond appropriately to human cues. In this review, we examine the cues that wild animals use to modulate their behavioral responses toward humans, such as human facial features and gaze direction. We discuss when wild animals are expected to attend to certain cues, how information is used, and the cognitive mechanisms involved. We consider how the cognitive abilities of wild animals are likely to be under selection by humans and therefore influence population and community composition. We conclude by highlighting the need for long-term studies on free-living, wild animals to fully understand the causes and ecological consequences of variation in responses to human cues. The effects of humans on wildlife behavior are likely to be substantial, and a detailed understanding of these effects is key to implementing effective conservation strategies and managing human-wildlife conflict.

Keywords: animal cognition; behavioral flexibility; categorization; class-level recognition; gaze sensitivity; generalization; human-wildlife interactions; individual recognition.

Copyright © 2020 Goumas, Lee, Boogert, Kelley and Thornton.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Factors that may affect wild animals’ behavioral responses during interactions with humans.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altbäcker V., Csányi V. (1990). The role of eyespots in predator recognition and antipredatory behaviour of the paradise fish, Macropodus opercularis L. Ethology 85, 51–57. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1990.tb00385.x - DOI
    1. Ango T. G., Börjeson L., Senbeta F. (2017). Crop raiding by wild mammals in Ethiopia: impacts on the livelihoods of smallholders in an agriculture-forest mosaic landscape. Oryx 51, 527–537. 10.1017/S0030605316000028 - DOI
    1. Austin C. M., Ramp D. (2019). Flight responses of eastern gray kangaroos to benign or harmful human behavior. Ecol. Evol. 9, 13824–13834. 10.1002/ece3.5818 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnosky A. D., Koch P. L., Feranec R. S., Wing S. L., Shabel A. B. (2004). Assessing the causes of late pleistocene extinctions on the continents. Science 306, 70–75. 10.1126/science.1101476, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrett L. P., Stanton L. A., Benson-Amram S. (2019). The cognition of ‘nuisance’ species. Anim. Behav. 147, 167–177. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.005 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources