What makes a language easy to learn? A preregistered study on how systematic structure and community size affect language learnability - PubMed (original) (raw)
What makes a language easy to learn? A preregistered study on how systematic structure and community size affect language learnability
Limor Raviv et al. Cognition. 2021 May.
Free article
Abstract
Cross-linguistic differences in morphological complexity could have important consequences for language learning. Specifically, it is often assumed that languages with more regular, compositional, and transparent grammars are easier to learn by both children and adults. Moreover, it has been shown that such grammars are more likely to evolve in bigger communities. Together, this suggests that some languages are acquired faster than others, and that this advantage can be traced back to community size and to the degree of systematicity in the language. However, the causal relationship between systematic linguistic structure and language learnability has not been formally tested, despite its potential importance for theories on language evolution, second language learning, and the origin of linguistic diversity. In this pre-registered study, we experimentally tested the effects of community size and systematic structure on adult language learning. We compared the acquisition of different yet comparable artificial languages that were created by big or small groups in a previous communication experiment, which varied in their degree of systematic linguistic structure. We asked (a) whether more structured languages were easier to learn; and (b) whether languages created by the bigger groups were easier to learn. We found that highly systematic languages were learned faster and more accurately by adults, but that the relationship between language learnability and linguistic structure was typically non-linear: high systematicity was advantageous for learning, but learners did not benefit from partly or semi-structured languages. Community size did not affect learnability: languages that evolved in big and small groups were equally learnable, and there was no additional advantage for languages created by bigger groups beyond their degree of systematic structure. Furthermore, our results suggested that predictability is an important advantage of systematic structure: participants who learned more structured languages were better at generalizing these languages to new, unfamiliar meanings, and different participants who learned the same more structured languages were more likely to produce similar labels. That is, systematic structure may allow speakers to converge effortlessly, such that strangers can immediately understand each other.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- Systematicity, but not compositionality: Examining the emergence of linguistic structure in children and adults using iterated learning.
Raviv L, Arnon I. Raviv L, et al. Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:160-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Sep 13. Cognition. 2018. PMID: 30218912 - Larger communities create more systematic languages.
Raviv L, Meyer A, Lev-Ari S. Raviv L, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 24;286(1907):20191262. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1262. Epub 2019 Jul 17. Proc Biol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31311478 Free PMC article. - Cross-linguistic frequency and the learnability of semantics: Artificial language learning studies of evidentiality.
Saratsli D, Bartell S, Papafragou A. Saratsli D, et al. Cognition. 2020 Apr;197:104194. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104194. Epub 2020 Jan 25. Cognition. 2020. PMID: 31986353 - Learning bias, cultural evolution of language, and the biological evolution of the language faculty.
Smith K. Smith K. Hum Biol. 2011 Apr;83(2):261-78. doi: 10.3378/027.083.0207. Hum Biol. 2011. PMID: 21615289 Review. - Direct and indirect effects of multilingualism on novel language learning: An integrative review.
Hirosh Z, Degani T. Hirosh Z, et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):892-916. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1315-7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018. PMID: 28547538 Review.
Cited by
- Category Clustering and Morphological Learning.
Mansfield J, Saldana C, Hurst P, Nordlinger R, Stoll S, Bickel B, Perfors A. Mansfield J, et al. Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13107. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13107. Cogn Sci. 2022. PMID: 35166378 Free PMC article. - Imperfect language learning reduces morphological overspecification: Experimental evidence.
Berdicevskis A, Semenuks A. Berdicevskis A, et al. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0262876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262876. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35085342 Free PMC article. - Voice modulatory cues to structure across languages and species.
Matzinger T, Fitch WT. Matzinger T, et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Dec 20;376(1840):20200393. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0393. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34719253 Free PMC article. Review. - Systematic mappings of sound to meaning: A theoretical review.
Haslett DA, Cai ZG. Haslett DA, et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):627-648. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02395-y. Epub 2023 Oct 6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 37803232 Review. - Conceptual Similarity and Communicative Need Shape Colexification: An Experimental Study.
Karjus A, Blythe RA, Kirby S, Wang T, Smith K. Karjus A, et al. Cogn Sci. 2021 Sep;45(9):e13035. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13035. Cogn Sci. 2021. PMID: 34491584 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources