Linguistic Analysis of Online Communication About a Novel Persecutory Belief System (Gangstalking): Mixed Methods Study - PubMed (original) (raw)

Linguistic Analysis of Online Communication About a Novel Persecutory Belief System (Gangstalking): Mixed Methods Study

Andrew Lustig et al. J Med Internet Res. 2021.

Abstract

Background: Gangstalking is a novel persecutory belief system whereby those affected believe they are being followed, stalked, and harassed by a large number of people, often numbering in the thousands. The harassment is experienced as an accretion of innumerable individually benign acts such as people clearing their throat, muttering under their breath, or giving dirty looks as they pass on the street. Individuals affected by this belief system congregate in online fora to seek support, share experiences, and interact with other like-minded individuals. Such people identify themselves as targeted individuals.

Objective: The objective of the study was to characterize the linguistic and rhetorical practices used by contributors to the gangstalking forum to construct, develop, and contest the gangstalking belief system.

Methods: This mixed methods study employed corpus linguistics, which involves using computational techniques to examine recurring linguistic patterns in large, digitized bodies of authentic language data. Discourse analysis is an approach to text analysis which focuses on the ways in which linguistic choices made by text creators contribute to particular functions and representations. We assembled a 225,000-word corpus of postings on a gangstalking support forum. We analyzed these data using keyword analysis, collocation analysis, and manual examination of concordances to identify discursive and rhetorical practices among self-identified targeted individuals.

Results: The gangstalking forum served as a site of discursive contest between 2 opposing worldviews. One is that gangstalking is a widespread, insidious, and centrally coordinated system of persecution employing community members, figures of authority, and state actors. This was the dominant discourse in the study corpus. The opposing view is a medicalized discourse supporting gangstalking as a form of mental disorder. Contributors used linguistic practices such as presupposition, nominalization, and the use of specialized jargon to construct gangstalking as real and external to the individual affected. Although contributors generally rejected the notion that they were affected by mental disorder, in some instances, they did label others in the forum as impacted/affected by mental illness if their accounts if their accounts were deemed to be too extreme or bizarre. Those affected demonstrated a concern with accumulating evidence to prove their position to incredulous others.

Conclusions: The study found that contributors to the study corpus accomplished a number of tasks. They used linguistic practices to co-construct an internally coherent and systematized persecutory belief system. They advanced a position that gangstalking is real and contested the medicalizing discourse that gangstalking is a form of mental disorder. They supported one another by sharing similar experiences and providing encouragement and advice. Finally, they commiserated over the challenges of proving the existence of gangstalking.

Keywords: computer mediated communication; corpus linguistics; delusions; discourse analysis; eHealth; internet; language; linguistics; online discourse; psychosis; schizophrenia.

©Andrew Lustig, Gavin Brookes, Daniel Hunt. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 05.03.2021.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Relative frequency of "gangstalking" as a Google search term.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sheridan LP, James DV. Complaints of group-stalking (‘gang-stalking’): an exploratory study of their nature and impact on complainants. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 2015 Jun 16;26(5):601–623. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2015.1054857. - DOI
    1. Sheridan L, James D, Roth J. The Phenomenology of Group Stalking ('Gang-Stalking'): A Content Analysis of Subjective Experiences. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 06;17(7):2506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072506. https://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=ijerph17072506 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spitzberg BH, Cupach WR. The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2007 Jan;12(1):64–86. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001. - DOI
    1. Mcphate M. United States of Paranoia: They See Gangs of Stalkers. The New York Times. 2016. Jun 10, [2020-10-21]. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/11/health/gang-stalking-targeted-individ....
    1. Weinberger S. Mind Games New on the Internet: a community of people who believe the government is beaming voices into their minds. They may be crazy, but the Pentagon has pursued a weapon that can do just that. The Washington Post. 2007. Jan 14, [2020-10-21]. https://tinyurl.com/s7ndk9uk.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources