Social Stigma toward Persons with Opioid Use Disorder: Results from a Nationally Representative Survey of U.S. Adults - PubMed (original) (raw)

Social Stigma toward Persons with Opioid Use Disorder: Results from a Nationally Representative Survey of U.S. Adults

Bruce G Taylor et al. Subst Use Misuse. 2021.

Abstract

Background: This study seeks to understand the general adult population's knowledge, attitudes, and stigma towards opioid use disorder (OUD), people with histories of opioid misuse, and policies related to OUD. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional national survey of the U.S. adult population, using AmeriSpeak's® web, probability-based panel. The number of participants were 947 (493 females and 454 males) general population adults ages 19 -89 years old who completed a self-report survey covering: social stigma of OUD, opioid policy attitudes, perceptions of OUD as a crime, knowledge and beliefs about opioids and treatment, personal experience with opioids and the criminal justice (CJ) system, and demographics. Results: Thirteen percent self-reported ever misusing opioids, 3% reported an opioid overdose, and 14% reported personal experience with the CJ system. On average, the general adult population moderately endorses stigmatizing behaviors, agrees that OUD is a medical condition, agrees with policies to increase access to OUD treatment, and is less likely to endorse OUD as a crime. Having a disregard for OUD as a medical condition was most associated with higher levels of stigma, endorsing OUD as a crime, and disagreeing with policies to help people access OUD treatment. Conclusions: Our data provide guidance to policymakers concerning individuals with certain characteristics to target for public education efforts to reduce stigma and draw more support for public heath interventions for OUD. Our data also suggest that the content of this education should include improving understanding of OUD as a medical condition.

Keywords: Opioids; general public; national sample; social stigma; substance use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander LA, & Link BG (2003). The impact of contact on stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness. Journal of Mental Health, 12(3), 271–289. 10.1080/0963823031000118267 - DOI
    1. Barry CL, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Gollust SE, Niederdeppe J, Bachhuber MA, Webster DW, & McGinty EE (2016). Understanding Americans’ views on opioid pain reliever abuse. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 111(1), 85–93. 10.1111/add.13077 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry CL, McGinty EE, Pescosolido BA, & Goldman HH (2014). Stigma, discrimination, treatment effectiveness, and policy: Public views about drug addiction and mental illness. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC: ), 65(10), 1269–1272. 10.1176/appi.ps.201400140 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bethlehem J, Cobben F, & Schouten B (2011). The use of response propensities. Handbook of nonresponse in household Surveys (pp. 327–352). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    1. Bilgen I, Dennis JM, & Ganesh N (2018). Nonresponse follow-up impact on amerispeak panel sample composition and representativeness. NORC.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources