Ten simple rules for avoiding predatory publishing scams - PubMed (original) (raw)

Editorial

Ten simple rules for avoiding predatory publishing scams

Michelle Leonard et al. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021.

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

• Predatory Publishing and the Academic Librarian: Developing Tools to Make Decisions.
  Lopez E, Gaspard CS. Lopez E, et al. Med Ref Serv Q. 2020 Jan-Mar;39(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1693205. Med Ref Serv Q. 2020. PMID: 32069201
• Academic nightmares: Predatory publishing.
  Van Nuland SE, Rogers KA. Van Nuland SE, et al. Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jul;10(4):392-394. doi: 10.1002/ase.1671. Epub 2016 Dec 2. Anat Sci Educ. 2017. PMID: 27911990
• Publication ethics.
  Hays JC. Hays JC. Public Health Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;26(3):205-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2009.00772.x. Public Health Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19386055 No abstract available.
• [Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].
  Matías-Guiu J, García-Ramos R. Matías-Guiu J, et al. Neurologia. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-4. Neurologia. 2010. PMID: 20388454 Review. Spanish.
• Ethical publishing: the innocent author's guide to avoiding misconduct.
  Wager E. Wager E. Menopause Int. 2007 Sep;13(3):98-102. doi: 10.1258/175404507781605604. Menopause Int. 2007. PMID: 17933094 Review.

Cited by

• Do orthopaedics surgeons have any idea what predatory journals are?:(cross-sectional study).
  Kamal AH. Kamal AH. Heliyon. 2024 Feb 19;10(5):e26448. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26448. eCollection 2024 Mar 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38434260 Free PMC article.

References

1. 1. Committee on Publication Ethics Council. COPE Discussion Document: Predatory Publishing Discussion Document [Internet]. Posted 2019 November [cited 2021 May 12]. Available from: 10.24318/cope.2019.3.6 with full credit from: https://publicationethics.org/. - DOI
2. 1. Think. Check. Submit [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 12]. Available from: https://thinkchecksubmit.org/.
3. 1. Think. Check. Attend [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 8]. Available from: https://thinkcheckattend.org.
4. 1. Espin J, Palmas S, Carrasco-Rueda F, Riemer K, Allen PE, Berkebile N, et al. A persistent lack of international representation on editorial boards in environmental biology. PLoS Biol. 2017;15(12):e2002760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002760 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
5. 1. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, DORA [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 11]. Available from: https://sfdora.org/read/.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

There is no source of funding that supports this work.

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Europe PubMed Central
  • PubMed Central
  • Public Library of Science