The Economic Burden of Vision Loss and Blindness in the United States - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2022 Apr;129(4):369-378.

doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

Affiliations

The Economic Burden of Vision Loss and Blindness in the United States

David B Rein et al. Ophthalmology. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the economic burden of vision loss (VL) in the United States and by state.

Design: Analysis of secondary data sources (American Community Survey [ACS], American Time Use Survey, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey [MEPS], National and State Health Expenditure Accounts, and National Health Interview Survey [NHIS]) using attributable fraction, regression, and other methods to estimate the incremental direct and indirect 2017 costs of VL.

Participants: People with a yes response to a question asking if they are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses in the ACS, MEPS, or NHIS.

Main outcome measures: We estimated the direct costs of medical, nursing home (NH), and supportive services and the indirect costs of absenteeism, lost household production, reduced labor force participation, and informal care by age group, sex, and state in aggregate and per person with VL.

Results: We estimated an economic burden of VL of 134.2billion:134.2 billion: 134.2billion:98.7 billion in direct costs and 35.5billioninindirectcosts.ThelargestburdencomponentswereNH(35.5 billion in indirect costs. The largest burden components were NH (35.5billioninindirectcosts.ThelargestburdencomponentswereNH(41.8 billion), other medical care services ($30.9 billion), and reduced labor force participation ($16.2 billion), all of which accounted for 66% of the total. Those with VL incurred 16838peryearinincrementalburden.Informalcarewasthelargestburdencomponentforpeople0to18yearsofage,reducedlaborforceparticipationwasthelargestburdencomponentforpeople19to64yearsofage,andNHcostswerethelargestburdencomponentforpeople65yearsofageorolder.NewYork,Connecticut,Massachusetts,RhodeIsland,andVermontexperiencedthehighestcostsperpersonwithVL.Sensitivityanalysesindicatetotalburdenmayrangebetween16 838 per year in incremental burden. Informal care was the largest burden component for people 0 to 18 years of age, reduced labor force participation was the largest burden component for people 19 to 64 years of age, and NH costs were the largest burden component for people 65 years of age or older. New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont experienced the highest costs per person with VL. Sensitivity analyses indicate total burden may range between 16838peryearinincrementalburden.Informalcarewasthelargestburdencomponentforpeople0to18yearsofage,reducedlaborforceparticipationwasthelargestburdencomponentforpeople19to64yearsofage,andNHcostswerethelargestburdencomponentforpeople65yearsofageorolder.NewYork,Connecticut,Massachusetts,RhodeIsland,andVermontexperiencedthehighestcostsperpersonwithVL.Sensitivityanalysesindicatetotalburdenmayrangebetween76 and $218 billion depending on the assumptions used in the model.

Conclusions: Self-reported VL imposes a substantial economic burden on the United States. Burden accrues in different ways at different ages, leading to state differences in the composition of per-person costs based on the age composition of the population with VL. Information on state variation can help local decision makers target resources better to address the burden of VL.

Keywords: Absenteeism; Blindness; Burden of disease; Cost of illness; Direct medical costs; Economic burden; Labor force participation; Nursing home costs; Productivity losses; Vision loss.

Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources