Bacteriology of expectorated sputum with quantitative culture and wash technique compared to transtracheal aspirates - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
Bacteriology of expectorated sputum with quantitative culture and wash technique compared to transtracheal aspirates
J G Bartlett et al. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Jun.
Abstract
Techniques to improve the reliability of expectorated sputum culture were evaluated in 46 patients using a wash technique, quantitative culture, and a combination of washing and quantification. The wash procedure consisted of a jet of tap water over the specimen contained in a tea strainer. The true lower respiratory tract flora was determined by percutaneous transtracheal aspirates, which served as the basis for evaluating the methods of processing expectorated specimens. Either washing alone or quantification alone decreased the number of specimens with organisms that were not present in companion transtracheal aspirates; however, results that were sufficiently improved to be clearly advantageous for clinical interpretation were achieved only when washing and quantification were combined. Washed sputum specimens yielded oropharyngeal "contaminants" in concentrations exceeding 10(6) bacteria per ml in 12 of 46 specimens (26 per cent). Using this technique, only one specimen contained a misleading potential pathogen, and only one specimen failed to yield a potential pathogen that was recovered with the transtracheal aspirate. The wash procedure decreased the mean concentrations of contaminants approximately 100-fold for all specimens and 1,000-fold for purulent specimens.
Similar articles
- Bacterial sputum cultures. A clinician's viewpoint.
Van Scoy RE. Van Scoy RE. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977 Jan;52(1):39-41. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977. PMID: 344996 - Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.
Murray PR, Washington JA. Murray PR, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339-44. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975. PMID: 1127999 - Diagnosis of bacterial infections of the lung.
Bartlett JG. Bartlett JG. Clin Chest Med. 1987 Mar;8(1):119-34. Clin Chest Med. 1987. PMID: 3552385 - Diagnostic problems in lower respiratory tract infections.
Lode H, Schaberg T, Raffenberg M, Mauch H. Lode H, et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jul;32 Suppl A:29-37. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_a.29. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993. PMID: 8407697 Review.
Cited by
- Gram Stain and Culture of Sputum Samples Detect Only Few Pathogens in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cartuliares MB, Skjøt-Arkil H, Mogensen CB, Skovsted TA, Andersen SL, Pedersen AK, Rosenvinge FS. Cartuliares MB, et al. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;13(4):628. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040628. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36832116 Free PMC article. - A review of the role of Haemophilus influenzae in community-acquired pneumonia.
Slack MPE. Slack MPE. Pneumonia (Nathan). 2015 Dec 1;6:26-43. doi: 10.15172/pneu.2015.6/520. eCollection 2015. Pneumonia (Nathan). 2015. PMID: 31641576 Free PMC article. Review. - Comparison of viral infection in healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Kim ES, Park KU, Lee SH, Lee YJ, Park JS, Cho YJ, Yoon HI, Lee CT, Lee JH. Kim ES, et al. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0192893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192893. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29447204 Free PMC article. - Severe community-acquired pneumonia.
Sligl WI, Marrie TJ. Sligl WI, et al. Crit Care Clin. 2013 Jul;29(3):563-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2013.03.009. Crit Care Clin. 2013. PMID: 23830654 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous