Optimising GPs' communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of 'safety-netting' in primary care - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Optimising GPs' communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of 'safety-netting' in primary care

Claire Friedemann Smith et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Safety-netting has become best practice when dealing with diagnostic uncertainty in primary care. Its use, however, is highly varied and a lack of evidence-based guidance on its communication could be harming its effectiveness and putting patient safety at risk.

Objective: To use a realist review method to produce a programme theory of safety-netting, that is, advice and support provided to patients when diagnosis or prognosis is uncertain, in primary care.

Methods: Five electronic databases, web searches, and grey literature were searched for studies assessing outcomes related to understanding and communicating safety-netting advice or risk communication, or the ability of patients to self-care and re-consult when appropriate. Characteristics of included documents were extracted into an Excel spreadsheet, and full texts uploaded into NVivo and coded. A random 10% sample was independently double -extracted and coded. Coded data wasere synthesised and itstheir ability to contribute an explanation for the contexts, mechanisms, or outcomes of effective safety-netting communication considered. Draft context, mechanism and outcome configurations (CMOCs) were written by the authors and reviewed by an expert panel of primary care professionals and patient representatives.

Results: 95 documents contributed to our CMOCs and programme theory. Effective safety-netting advice should be tailored to the patient and provide practical information for self-care and reconsultation. The importance of ensuring understanding and agreement with advice was highlighted, as was consideration of factors such as previous experiences with healthcare, the patient's personal circumstances and the consultation setting. Safety-netting advice should be documented in sufficient detail to facilitate continuity of care.

Conclusions: We present 15 recommendations to enhance communication of safety-netting advice and map these onto established consultation models. Effective safety-netting communication relies on understanding the information needs of the patient, barriers to acceptance and explanation of the reasons why the advice is being given. Reduced continuity of care, increasing multimorbidity and remote consultations represent threats to safety-netting communication.

Keywords: communication; decision making; patient safety; primary care; risk management.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

The realist review process.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Flow of materials included in the review.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Programme theory of safety-netting. CMOC, context, mechanism and outcome configuration.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heneghan C, Glasziou P, Thompson M, et al. . Diagnostic strategies used in primary care. BMJ 2009;338:b946. 10.1136/bmj.b946 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, et al. . Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet 2017;390:156–68. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall AM, Aubrey-Bassler K, Thorne B, et al. . Do not routinely offer imaging for uncomplicated low back pain. BMJ 2021;372:n291. 10.1136/bmj.n291 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicholson BD, Mant D, Bankhead C. Can safety-netting improve cancer detection in patients with vague symptoms? BMJ 2016;355:i5515. 10.1136/bmj.i5515 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tompson A, Nicholson BD, Ziebland S, et al. . Quality improvements of safety-netting guidelines for cancer in UK primary care: insights from a qualitative interview study of GPs. Br J Gen Pract 2019;69:e819–26. 10.3399/bjgp19X706565 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources