An Evaluation of the Occupational Health Hazards of Peptide Couplers - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2022 Jun 20;35(6):1011-1022.
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00031. Epub 2022 May 9.
Alejandra Trejo-Martin 2, Martyn L Chilton 3, Jakub Kostal 4, Joel Bercu 2, Gregory L Beutner 5, Uma S Bruen 6, David G Dolan 7, Stephen Gomez 8, Jedd Hillegass 5, John Nicolette 9, Matthew Schmitz 10
Affiliations
- PMID: 35532537
- PMCID: PMC9214767
- DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00031
An Evaluation of the Occupational Health Hazards of Peptide Couplers
Jessica C Graham et al. Chem Res Toxicol. 2022.
Abstract
Peptide couplers (also known as amide bond-forming reagents or coupling reagents) are broadly used in organic chemical syntheses, especially in the pharmaceutical industry. Yet, occupational health hazards associated with this chemical class are largely unexplored, which is disconcerting given the intrinsic reactivity of these compounds. Several case studies involving occupational exposures reported adverse respiratory and dermal health effects, providing initial evidence of chemical sensitization. To address the paucity of toxicological data, a pharmaceutical cross-industry task force was formed to evaluate and assess the potential of these compounds to cause eye and dermal irritation as well as corrosivity and dermal sensitization. The goal of our work was to inform health and safety professionals as well as pharmaceutical and organic chemists of the occupational health hazards associated with this chemical class. To that end, 25 of the most commonly used peptide couplers and five hydrolysis products were selected for in vivo, in vitro, and in silico testing. Our findings confirmed that dermal sensitization is a concern for this chemical class with 21/25 peptide couplers testing positive for dermal sensitization and 15 of these being strong/extreme sensitizers. We also found that dermal corrosion and irritation (8/25) as well as eye irritation (9/25) were health hazards associated with peptide couplers and their hydrolysis products (4/5 were dermal irritants or corrosive and 4/5 were eye irritants). Resulting outcomes were synthesized to inform decision making in peptide coupler selection and enable data-driven hazard communication to workers. The latter includes harmonized hazard classifications, appropriate handling recommendations, and accurate safety data sheets, which support the industrial hygiene hierarchy of control strategies and risk assessment. Our study demonstrates the merits of an integrated, in vivo -in silico analysis, applied here to the skin sensitization endpoint using the Computer-Aided Discovery and REdesign (CADRE) and Derek Nexus programs. We show that experimental data can improve predictive models by filling existing data gaps while, concurrently, providing computational insights into key initiating events and elucidating the chemical structural features contributing to adverse health effects. This interactive, interdisciplinary approach is consistent with Green Chemistry principles that seek to improve the selection and design of less hazardous reagents in industrial processes and applications.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Figures
Figure 1
Subclasses of amide bond forming agents. The most common peptide couplers can be divided into five main subclasses, including amidiniums (amidinium salts), activated phosphorous(V) compounds (phosphonium salts), carbodiimides, activated triazines (activated heterocycles), and activated carbonyls.
Similar articles
- Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
Graham JC, Wilt N, Costin GE, Villano C, Bader J, Krawiec L, Sly E, Gould J. Graham JC, et al. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2018 Dec;37(4):380-390. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2018.1483944. Epub 2018 Jul 23. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2018. PMID: 30035615 - Characterization of occupational exposures to cleaning products used for common cleaning tasks--a pilot study of hospital cleaners.
Bello A, Quinn MM, Perry MJ, Milton DK. Bello A, et al. Environ Health. 2009 Mar 27;8:11. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-11. Environ Health. 2009. PMID: 19327131 Free PMC article. - Hazard identification of strong dermal sensitizers.
Gould JC, Taylor S. Gould JC, et al. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2011 Feb;21(2):86-92. doi: 10.3109/15376516.2010.484622. Epub 2010 May 25. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2011. PMID: 20500014 - Human-relevant approaches to assess eye corrosion/irritation potential of agrochemical formulations.
Clippinger AJ, Raabe HA, Allen DG, Choksi NY, van der Zalm AJ, Kleinstreuer NC, Barroso J, Lowit AB. Clippinger AJ, et al. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2021 Jun;40(2):145-167. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2021.1910291. Epub 2021 Apr 20. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2021. PMID: 33830843 Review. - Final report on the safety assessment of Triethylene Glycol and PEG-4.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Int J Toxicol. 2006;25 Suppl 2:121-38. doi: 10.1080/10915810600964642. Int J Toxicol. 2006. PMID: 17090481 Review.
Cited by
- Fatty aldehyde bisulfite adducts as a purification handle in ionizable lipid synthesis.
Atwood G, Purbiya S, Reid C, Smith B, Kaur K, Wicks D, Gaudet P, MacLeod KC, Vincent-Rocan JF. Atwood G, et al. RSC Adv. 2024 Aug 19;14(36):26233-26238. doi: 10.1039/d4ra05189k. eCollection 2024 Aug 16. RSC Adv. 2024. PMID: 39161429 Free PMC article. - Direct formation of amide/peptide bonds from carboxylic acids: no traditional coupling reagents, 1-pot, and green.
Freiberg KM, Kavthe RD, Thomas RM, Fialho DM, Dee P, Scurria M, Lipshutz BH. Freiberg KM, et al. Chem Sci. 2023 Feb 28;14(13):3462-3469. doi: 10.1039/d3sc00198a. eCollection 2023 Mar 29. Chem Sci. 2023. PMID: 37006678 Free PMC article. - Efficient Solution-Phase Dipeptide Synthesis Using Titanium Tetrachloride and Microwave Heating.
Cavallaro PA, De Santo M, Marinaro R, Belsito EL, Liguori A, Leggio A. Cavallaro PA, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 8;25(17):9729. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179729. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39273676 Free PMC article. - O data, where art thou? Revolutionizing data sharing to advance our sustainability goals through smart chemical innovation.
Kostal J, Brooks BW, Smith CA, Devineni G. Kostal J, et al. iScience. 2022 Oct 2;25(11):105256. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105256. eCollection 2022 Nov 18. iScience. 2022. PMID: 36281453 Free PMC article. Review. - Process Mass Intensity (PMI): A Holistic Analysis of Current Peptide Manufacturing Processes Informs Sustainability in Peptide Synthesis.
Kekessie I, Wegner K, Martinez I, Kopach ME, White TD, Tom JK, Kenworthy MN, Gallou F, Lopez J, Koenig SG, Payne PR, Eissler S, Arumugam B, Li C, Mukherjee S, Isidro-Llobet A, Ludemann-Hombourger O, Richardson P, Kittelmann J, Sejer Pedersen D, van den Bos LJ. Kekessie I, et al. J Org Chem. 2024 Apr 5;89(7):4261-4282. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c01494. Epub 2024 Mar 20. J Org Chem. 2024. PMID: 38508870 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources