A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer - PubMed (original) (raw)
A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer
A Liberati et al. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Jun.
Abstract
The methodology of randomized control trials (RCTs) of the primary treatment of early breast cancer has been reviewed using a quantitative method. Sixty-three RCTs comparing various treatment modalities tested on over 34,000 patients and reported in 119 papers were evaluated according to a standardized scoring system. A percentage score was developed to assess the internal validity of a study (referring to the quality of its design and execution) and its external validity (referring to presentation of information required to determine its generalizability). An overall score was also calculated as the combination of the two. The mean overall score for the 63 RCTs was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46% to 54%) with small and nonstatistically significant differences between types of trial. The most common methodologic deficiencies encountered in these studies were related to the randomization process (only 27 of the 63 RCTs adopted a truly blinded procedure), the handling of withdrawals (only 26 RCTs included all patients in the analyses), the description of the follow-up schedule (only 12 RCTs reported adequately), the report of side effects (adequate information given in 33 RCTs), and the description of the patient population (satisfactory in 29 RCTs). Telephone calls to the principal investigators improved the quality scores by seven points on a scale of 100, indicating that some of the deficiencies lay in reporting rather than performance. There was evidence that quality has improved over time and that the increasing tendency of involving a biostatistician in the research team was positively associated with the improvement of the internal validity but not with the external.
Similar articles
- Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M. Groenvold M. Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184. Dan Med Bull. 2010. PMID: 20816024 - The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine: a survey of 13 randomly selected journals from mainland China.
Wang G, Mao B, Xiong ZY, Fan T, Chen XD, Wang L, Liu GJ, Liu J, Guo J, Chang J, Wu TX, Li TQ; CONSORT Group for Traditional Chinese Medicine. Wang G, et al. Clin Ther. 2007 Jul;29(7):1456-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.023. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 17825697 Review. - Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media.
Powe NR, Kinnison ML, Steinberg EP. Powe NR, et al. Radiology. 1989 Feb;170(2):377-80. doi: 10.1148/radiology.170.2.2911662. Radiology. 1989. PMID: 2911662 - Randomized controlled trials in testicular cancer: A demographic and quality assessment.
Nayan M, Jayalath VH, Jewett MA, Bedard PL, Hamilton RJ. Nayan M, et al. Urol Oncol. 2016 Feb;34(2):60.e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 20. Urol Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26493448 Clinical Trial. - Quality evaluation of randomized controlled trials reports of laparoscopy compared with open colorectal resection for colorectal cancer.
Huang D, Jin X, Gao J, Li Y, Lu L, Sun F, Chen D, Zhao W, Luo W, Li H, Hu Y, Hu F. Huang D, et al. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015 Jun;15(6):727-32. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1043896. Epub 2015 May 23. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015. PMID: 26004141 Review.
Cited by
- Identification of tools used to assess the external validity of randomized controlled trials in reviews: a systematic review of measurement properties.
Jung A, Balzer J, Braun T, Luedtke K. Jung A, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01561-5. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022. PMID: 35387582 Free PMC article. Review. - The Template for Intervention Description and Replication as a Measure of Intervention Reporting Quality: Rasch Analysis.
Dijkers MP, Millis SR. Dijkers MP, et al. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 Apr 23;2(3):100055. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100055. eCollection 2020 Sep. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020. PMID: 33543082 Free PMC article. - Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Restless Legs Syndrome Based on the CONSORT Statement.
Rikos D, Dardiotis E, Aloizou AM, Siokas V, Zintzaras E, Hadjigeorgiou GM. Rikos D, et al. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2019 Jun 18;9. doi: 10.7916/d8-0f2v-aq62. eCollection 2019. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2019. PMID: 31413890 Free PMC article. - Guideline recommendations and antimicrobial resistance: the need for a change.
Elias C, Moja L, Mertz D, Loeb M, Forte G, Magrini N. Elias C, et al. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):e016264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016264. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28751488 Free PMC article. Review. - Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials.
Mittal N, Mittal R, Kumar H, Medhi B. Mittal N, et al. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):21-7. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.173777. Perspect Clin Res. 2016. PMID: 26955572 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical