Sequential covariate-adjusted randomization via hierarchically minimizing Mahalanobis distance and marginal imbalance - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2024 Mar 27;80(2):ujae047.
doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae047.
Affiliations
- PMID: 38801258
- DOI: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae047
Sequential covariate-adjusted randomization via hierarchically minimizing Mahalanobis distance and marginal imbalance
Haoyu Yang et al. Biometrics. 2024.
Abstract
In comparative studies, covariate balance and sequential allocation schemes have attracted growing academic interest. Although many theoretically justified adaptive randomization methods achieve the covariate balance, they often allocate patients in pairs or groups. To better meet the practical requirements where the clinicians cannot wait for other participants to assign the current patient for some economic or ethical reasons, we propose a method that randomizes patients individually and sequentially. The proposed method conceptually separates the covariate imbalance, measured by the newly proposed modified Mahalanobis distance, and the marginal imbalance, that is the sample size difference between the 2 groups, and it minimizes them with an explicit priority order. Compared with the existing sequential randomization methods, the proposed method achieves the best possible covariate balance while maintaining the marginal balance directly, offering us more control of the randomization process. We demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method through a wide range of simulation studies and real data analysis, and also establish theoretical guarantees for the proposed method in terms of both the convergence of the imbalance measure and the subsequent treatment effect estimation.
Keywords: Mahalanobis distance; covariate balance; sequential randomization; treatment effect.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Biometric Society.
Similar articles
- Adaptive Randomization Method to Prevent Extreme Instances of Group Size and Covariate Imbalance in Stroke Trials.
Italiano D, Campbell B, Hill MD, Johns HT, Churilov L. Italiano D, et al. Stroke. 2024 Aug;55(8):1962-1972. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.046269. Epub 2024 Jun 26. Stroke. 2024. PMID: 38920051 - A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
Gu X, Lee JJ. Gu X, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jun 5;10:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-48. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010. PMID: 20525382 Free PMC article. - Rematching on-the-fly: Sequential matched randomization and a case for covariate-adjusted randomization.
Chipman JJ, Mayberry L, Greevy RA Jr. Chipman JJ, et al. Stat Med. 2023 Sep 30;42(22):3981-3995. doi: 10.1002/sim.9843. Epub 2023 Jul 13. Stat Med. 2023. PMID: 37439157 Free PMC article. - Randomization in substance abuse clinical trials.
Hedden SL, Woolson RF, Malcolm RJ. Hedden SL, et al. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 Feb 6;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-6. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006. PMID: 16722591 Free PMC article. Review. - The pursuit of balance: An overview of covariate-adaptive randomization techniques in clinical trials.
Lin Y, Zhu M, Su Z. Lin Y, et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Aug 2. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015. PMID: 26244705 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources