Critical-point drying versus freeze drying for scanning electron microscopy: a quantitative and qualitative study on isolated hepatocytes - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
Critical-point drying versus freeze drying for scanning electron microscopy: a quantitative and qualitative study on isolated hepatocytes
B G Nordestgaard et al. J Microsc. 1985 Feb.
Abstract
Critical-point drying and freeze drying were compared both quantitatively and qualitatively as preparative procedures for scanning electron microscopy. Isolated hepatocytes were used as model cells. Nomarski differential interference contrast microscopy was used for light microscopic measurements of the hepatocytes in the unfixed, the glutaraldehyde fixed, the glutaraldehyde + OsO4 fixed, the critical-point dried and the freeze dried states. Critical-point dried hepatocytes were found to shrink to 38% of glutaraldehyde + OsO4 fixed volume, whereas optimal freeze dried hepatocytes (frozen in water saturated with chloroform and freeze dried at 183 K for 84 h) were found to shrink to 51% of glutaraldehyde + OsO4 fixed volume. Transmission and scanning electron micrographs of the critical-point dried cells showed well-preserved ultrastructure and surface structure. Micrographs of the freeze dried cells showed ultrastructure destroyed by internal ice crystals and surface structure destroyed by external ice crystals. Double-fixed isolated hepatocytes were shown to swell during storage in buffer and to shrink during storage after critical-point drying. For low magnification scanning electron microscopy (up to about 3000 times) both critical-point drying and freeze drying can be used. However, for high magnification scanning electron microscopy, critical-point drying is superior to freeze drying.
Similar articles
- The structure of the cytoplasmic matrix preserved by freeze-drying and freeze-substitution.
Porter KR, Anderson KL. Porter KR, et al. Eur J Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;29(1):83-96. Eur J Cell Biol. 1982. PMID: 6818029 - Freeze-drying from tertiary butanol in the preparation of endocardium for scanning electron microscopy.
Wheeler EE, Gavin JB, Seelye RN. Wheeler EE, et al. Stain Technol. 1975 Sep;50(5):331-7. doi: 10.3109/10520297509117083. Stain Technol. 1975. PMID: 1209660 - Evaluation of collagen gel microstructure by scanning electron microscopy.
Pogorelov AG, Selezneva II. Pogorelov AG, et al. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2010 Dec;150(1):153-6. doi: 10.1007/s10517-010-1091-0. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2010. PMID: 21161075 - Preservation and visualization of molecular structure in detergent-extracted whole mounts of cultured cells.
Lindroth M, Bell PB Jr, Fredriksson BA, Liu XD. Lindroth M, et al. Microsc Res Tech. 1992 Jul 1;22(2):130-50. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070220203. Microsc Res Tech. 1992. PMID: 1504345 Review. - Scanning electron microscopy of the mammalian organ of Corti: assessment of preparative procedures.
Forge A, Nevill G, Zajic G, Wright A. Forge A, et al. Scanning Microsc. 1992 Jun;6(2):521-34; discussion 534-5. Scanning Microsc. 1992. PMID: 1462137 Review.
Cited by
- Quantitating morphological changes in biological samples during scanning electron microscopy sample preparation with correlative super-resolution microscopy.
Zhang Y, Huang T, Jorgens DM, Nickerson A, Lin LJ, Pelz J, Gray JW, López CS, Nan X. Zhang Y, et al. PLoS One. 2017 May 31;12(5):e0176839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176839. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28562683 Free PMC article. - The anterior esophageal region of Schistosoma japonicum is a secretory organ.
Li XH, Stark M, Vance GM, Cao JP, Wilson RA. Li XH, et al. Parasit Vectors. 2014 Dec 10;7:565. doi: 10.1186/s13071-014-0565-8. Parasit Vectors. 2014. PMID: 25490864 Free PMC article. - The microscopic network structure of mussel (Mytilus) adhesive plaques.
Filippidi E, DeMartini DG, Malo de Molina P, Danner EW, Kim J, Helgeson ME, Waite JH, Valentine MT. Filippidi E, et al. J R Soc Interface. 2015 Dec 6;12(113):20150827. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0827. J R Soc Interface. 2015. PMID: 26631333 Free PMC article. - An easy, fast and inexpensive method of preparing a biological specimen for scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Ali R, El-Boubbou K, Boudjelal M. Ali R, et al. MethodsX. 2021 Sep 20;8:101521. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101521. eCollection 2021. MethodsX. 2021. PMID: 34754792 Free PMC article. - Dimensional changes in cells and tissues during specimen preparation for the electron microscope.
King MV. King MV. Cell Biophys. 1991 Feb;18(1):31-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02990514. Cell Biophys. 1991. PMID: 1725502 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources