Detection and resolution of visual stimuli by turtle photoreceptors - PubMed (original) (raw)

Detection and resolution of visual stimuli by turtle photoreceptors

D A Baylor et al. J Physiol. 1973 Oct.

Abstract

1. Hyperpolarizing responses up to 30 mV in amplitude were recorded from cones and from certain cells believed to be rods in the isolated retina of the swamp turtle, Pseudemys scripta elegans.2. The responses evoked by weak flashes of light reach their maximum in 100-140 msec in red-sensitive cones, 140-180 msec in green-sensitive cones, and 300-600 msec in the rod-like cells (20 degrees C).3. The cone response evoked by weak flashes of light is linearly related to light intensity and obeys the superposition principle in that the response to a very weak step of light is the integral of the response to a very weak flash.4. On the basis of their spectral sensitivities cones can be divided into three distinct classes, namely red-sensitive cones whose relative quantum sensitivity is maximal at 630 nm, green-sensitive cones with a maximal sensitivity at 550 nm and blue-sensitive cones with a maximum at 460 nm.5. The difference between the spectral sensitivity of rods with a maximum at about 520 nm and green-sensitive cones (lambda(max) = 550 nm) is consistent with the view that both receptors contain a 518(2) retinal pigment as reported by Liebman & Granda, but that light is filtered by an orange oil droplet in green-sensitive cones.6. The spectral sensitivities of both red- and green-sensitive cones agree well amongst themselves at long wave-lengths but differ markedly in the extent of the reduction at short wave-lengths. This variation is attributed to differences in the extent to which light is filtered through the coloured oil droplets.7. There is a significant positive correlation between the absolute sensitivity of red- and green-sensitive cones and the reduction in sensitivity at short wave-lengths. This would be explained if a greater fraction of the light passes through the oil droplet in the most sensitive cells.8. The absolute flash sensitivities of the most sensitive receptors were about 250 muV photon(-1) mum(2) in red- and green-sensitive cones, 120 muV photon(-1) mum(2) in blue-sensitive cones, and 1300 muV photon(-1) mum(2) in rods.9. If the effective collecting area (which includes factors for absorption etc.) is taken as 10 mum(2) in a red-sensitive cone the peak hyperpolarization produced by 1 photon would average 25 muV.10. Provided that small spots of light are used, individual receptors obey the ;univariance principle' and the response produced by light of strength I', and wave-length lambda(1) can be matched by a light of strength kI' and wave-length lambda(2), where k is the same for all values of I'.11. A small proportion of cones behave like isolated units in that they have very sharp sensitivity-profiles and obey the univariance principle with respect to the position as well as to the wave-length of light.12. The majority of red and green cones have more diffuse sensitivity-profiles, sometimes with bumps on the descending limb, and behave as though cones with the same spectral sensitivity were electrically coupled to one another.13. The relation between the area of illumination and flash sensitivity agreed approximately with that calculated from the spatial profile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Physiol. 1966 Aug;185(3):536-55 - PubMed
    1. Vision Res. 1967 Mar;7(3):111-20 - PubMed
    1. Vision Res. 1967 May;7(5):349-69 - PubMed
    1. Vision Res. 1967 Nov;7(11):847-51 - PubMed
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1969 May;32(3):339-55 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources