Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex - PubMed (original) (raw)
Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex
J A Movshon et al. J Physiol. 1978 Oct.
Abstract
1. We have examined the responses of simple cells in the cat's atriate cortex to visual patterns that were designed to reveal the extent to which these cells may be considered to sum light-evoked influences linearly across their receptive fields. We used one-dimensional luminance-modulated bars and grating as stimuli; their orientation was always the same as the preferred orientation of the neurone under study. The stimuli were presented on an oscilloscope screen by a digital computer, which also accumulated neuronal responses and controlled a randomized sequence of stimulus presentations. 2. The majority of simple cells respond to sinusoidal gratings that are moving or whose contrast is modulated in time in a manner consistent with the hypothesis that they have linear spatial summation. Their responses to moving gratings of all spatial frequencies are modulated in synchrony with the passage of the gratings' bars across their receptive fields, and they do not produce unmodulated responses even at the highest spatial frequencies. Many of these cells respond to temporally modulated stationary gratings simply by changing their response amplitude sinusoidally as the spatial phase of the grating the grating is varied. Nonetheless, their behavior appears to indicate linear spatial summation, since we show in an Appendix that the absence of a 'null' phase in a visual neurone need not indicate non-linear spatial summation, and further that a linear neurone lacking a 'null' phase should give responses of the form that we have observed in this type of simple cell. 3. A minority of simple cells appears to have significant non-linearities of spatial summation. These neurones respond to moving gratings of high spatial frequency with a partially or totally unmodulated elevation of firing rate. They have no 'null' phases when tested with stationary gratings, and reveal their non-linearity by giving responses to gratings of some spatial phases that are composed partly or wholly of even harmonics of the stimulus frequency ('on-off' responses). 4. We compared simple receptive fields with their sensitivity to sinusoidal gratings of different spatial frequencies. Qualitatively, the most sensitive subregions of simple cells' receptive fields are roughly the same width as the individual bars of the gratings to which they are most sensitive. Quantitatively, their receptive field profiles measured with thin stationary lines, agree well with predicted profiles derived by Fourier synthesis of their spatial frequency tuning curves.
Comment in
- What simple and complex cells compute.
Carandini M. Carandini M. J Physiol. 2006 Dec 1;577(Pt 2):463-6. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.118976. Epub 2006 Sep 14. J Physiol. 2006. PMID: 16973710 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex.
Movshon JA, Thompson ID, Tolhurst DJ. Movshon JA, et al. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:79-99. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012489. J Physiol. 1978. PMID: 722592 Free PMC article. - Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation.
DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD. DeAngelis GC, et al. J Neurophysiol. 1993 Apr;69(4):1118-35. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.4.1118. J Neurophysiol. 1993. PMID: 8492152 - Spatial properties of cells in the rabbit's striate cortex.
Glanzman DL. Glanzman DL. J Physiol. 1983 Jul;340:535-53. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014779. J Physiol. 1983. PMID: 6887061 Free PMC article. - Linearity and non-linearity in cortical receptive fields.
Shapley RM. Shapley RM. Ciba Found Symp. 1994;184:71-81; discussion 81-7, 120-8. doi: 10.1002/9780470514610.ch4. Ciba Found Symp. 1994. PMID: 7882762 Review. - Capabilities of monkey cortical cells in spatial-resolution tasks.
Parker A, Hawken M. Parker A, et al. J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Jul;2(7):1101-14. doi: 10.1364/josaa.2.001101. J Opt Soc Am A. 1985. PMID: 3926970 Review.
Cited by
- A novel interface for cortical columnar neuromodulation with multipoint infrared neural stimulation.
Tian F, Zhang Y, Schriver KE, Hu JM, Roe AW. Tian F, et al. Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 2;15(1):6528. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50375-0. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 39095351 Free PMC article. - Differential cortical and subcortical visual processing with eyes shut.
Cicero NG, Klimova M, Lewis LD, Ling S. Cicero NG, et al. J Neurophysiol. 2024 Jul 1;132(1):54-60. doi: 10.1152/jn.00073.2024. Epub 2024 May 29. J Neurophysiol. 2024. PMID: 38810261 Free PMC article. - Primate V2 Receptive Fields Derived from Anatomically Identified Large-Scale V1 Inputs.
Hassanpour MS, Merlin S, Federer F, Zaidi Q, Angelucci A. Hassanpour MS, et al. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 May 17:rs.3.rs-4139501. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4139501/v1. Res Sq. 2024. PMID: 38798339 Free PMC article. Preprint. - Brightness illusions drive a neuronal response in the primary visual cortex under top-down modulation.
Saeedi A, Wang K, Nikpourian G, Bartels A, Logothetis NK, Totah NK, Watanabe M. Saeedi A, et al. Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 23;15(1):3141. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46885-6. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38653975 Free PMC article. - Visual Corticotectal Neurons in Awake Rabbits: Receptive Fields and Driving Monosynaptic Thalamocortical Inputs.
Su C, Mendes-Platt RF, Alonso JM, Swadlow HA, Bereshpolova Y. Su C, et al. J Neurosci. 2024 May 8;44(19):e1945232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1945-23.2024. J Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38485258 Free PMC article.
References
- J Physiol. 1966 Dec;187(3):517-52 - PubMed
- J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106-54 - PubMed
- Biophys J. 1960 Sep;1:15-28 - PubMed
- J Opt Soc Am. 1956 Sep;46(9):721-39 - PubMed
- J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:79-99 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous