Insertion signal sequence fused to minimal peptides elicits specific CD8+ T-cell responses and prolongs survival of thymoma-bearing mice - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 1994 Aug 1;54(15):4155-61.
Affiliations
- PMID: 7518351
- PMCID: PMC2254935
Insertion signal sequence fused to minimal peptides elicits specific CD8+ T-cell responses and prolongs survival of thymoma-bearing mice
B R Minev et al. Cancer Res. 1994.
Abstract
CD8+ T-lymphocytes (TCD8+) recognize minimal peptides of 8-10 residues which are the products of intracellularly processed proteins and are presented at the cell surface by major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. An important step in this process is the translocation of processed proteins from the cytosol across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, mediated by transporter associated with antigen-processing proteins or alternatively by endoplasmic reticulum-insertion signal sequences located at the NH2-terminus of the precursor molecules. We report here that the addition of an endoplasmic reticulum-insertion signal sequence at the NH2-terminus of TCD8+ epitopes from chicken ovalbumin (amino acids 257-264) or a naturally occurring tumor antigen expressed by the murine mastocytoma P815 (P1A amino acids 35-43) significantly enhanced the priming of specific TCD8+ in vivo. The signal sequence did not enhance peptide immunogenicity by merely increasing the hydrophobicity of the peptide, since ovalbumin amino acids 257-264 peptide with the signal sequence at its COOH-terminus did not demonstrate enhanced efficacy. The signal sequence did not act as a helper epitope, since TCD8+ responses were not diminished in class II-deficient transgenic mice or in mice depleted of CD4+ T-cells in vivo. Importantly, a single immunization with the fusion peptide significantly prolonged survival of mice challenged with E.G7OVA, a thymoma transfected with the complementary DNA of chicken ovalbumin.
Figures
Fig. 1
ESOVA but not OVAES or OVA enhances priming in vivo. Specific anti-OVA immune response was elicited by immunization with synthetic peptides in IFA (A) or PBS (B). C57BL/6N mice were immunized with 200 _μ_g/mouse ESOVA (●), OVAES (▽), OVA (▼), or PBS (□). After 10 days, recipient spleen cells were stimulated against OVA minimal peptide in vitro for 6 days and their cytotoxic activity was determined with EL-4 cells (left), EL-4 cells pulsed with OVA257–264 for 90 min (middle), or E.G7OVA cells (right).
Fig. 2
ESOVA enhances priming in vivo in mice depleted of TCD4+. A, FACS analysis of splenocytes isolated from normal nondepleted (left column), TCD4+-depleted (middle column), or TCD8+-depleted (right column) mice. Mice were given i.v. injections, three times at intervals of 6 days, of antibody GK1.5 (anti-CD4) or 2.43 (anti-CD8). FACS analysis was performed on the day of secondary stimulation of splenocytes, using fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibodies. B, cytotoxic activity in nondepleted (left), TCD4+-depleted (middle), or TCD8+-depleted (right) mice. C57BL/6N mice were depleted of TCD4+ or TCD8+ as described in the text. The mice were immunized with ESOVA (●), OVAES (▽), OVA (▼), or PBS (□). After 10 days, recipient spleen cells were stimulated against OVA minimal peptide in vitro for 6 days and their cytotoxic activity was determined with EL-4 cells pulsed with OVA257–264 for 90 min.
Fig. 3
ESOVA enhances priming in vivo in the absence of MHC class II. MHC class II-deficient transgenic mice were immunized with ESOVA (●), OVA (▼), or PBS (□). After 10 days, recipient spleen cells were stimulated in vitro for 6 days against OVA minimal peptide and their cytotoxic activity was determined with EL-4 cells (left) or EL-4 cells pulsed with OVA257–264 for 90 min (right).
Fig. 4
Immunoprotection of C57BL/6N mice challenged with E.G7OVA cells by a single immunization with ESOVA in IFA (A) or PBS (B). Mice were immunized with ESOVA, OVAES, OVA, or PBS 10 days before the challenge with 104 E.G7OVA cells.
Fig. 5
ESP1A but not P1A enhances priming in vivo. Specific anti-P1A immune response was elicited by immunization with synthetic peptides in IFA (A) or PBS (B). DBA/2 mice were immunized with 200 _μ_g/mouse ESP1A (●), P1A (▼), or PBS (▽). After 10 days, recipient spleen cells were stimulated against P1A minimal peptide in vitro for 6 days and their cytotoxic activity was determined with P815 cells (left), CT-26 cells (middle), or CT-26 cells pulsed with P1A35–43 for 90 min (right).
Similar articles
- Minimal determinant expressed by a recombinant vaccinia virus elicits therapeutic antitumor cytolytic T lymphocyte responses.
McCabe BJ, Irvine KR, Nishimura MI, Yang JC, Spiess PJ, Shulman EP, Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP. McCabe BJ, et al. Cancer Res. 1995 Apr 15;55(8):1741-7. Cancer Res. 1995. PMID: 7536130 Free PMC article. - Effective induction of anti-tumor immune responses with oligomannose-coated liposome targeting to intraperitoneal phagocytic cells.
Ikehara Y, Shiuchi N, Kabata-Ikehara S, Nakanishi H, Yokoyama N, Takagi H, Nagata T, Koide Y, Kuzushima K, Takahashi T, Tsujimura K, Kojima N. Ikehara Y, et al. Cancer Lett. 2008 Feb 18;260(1-2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.10.038. Cancer Lett. 2008. PMID: 18077084 - Augmented induction of CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell response and antitumour resistance by T helper type 1-inducing peptide.
Kikuchi T, Uehara S, Ariga H, Tokunaga T, Kariyone A, Tamura T, Takatsu K. Kikuchi T, et al. Immunology. 2006 Jan;117(1):47-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02262.x. Immunology. 2006. PMID: 16423040 Free PMC article. - An essential role of antigen-presenting cell/T-helper type 1 cell-cell interactions in draining lymph node during complete eradication of class II-negative tumor tissue by T-helper type 1 cell therapy.
Chamoto K, Wakita D, Narita Y, Zhang Y, Noguchi D, Ohnishi H, Iguchi T, Sakai T, Ikeda H, Nishimura T. Chamoto K, et al. Cancer Res. 2006 Feb 1;66(3):1809-17. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2246. Cancer Res. 2006. PMID: 16452242 - Primary T-cell and activated macrophage response associated with tumor protection using peptide/poly-N-acetyl glucosamine vaccination.
Maitre N, Brown JM, Demcheva M, Kelley JR, Lockett MA, Vournakis J, Cole DJ. Maitre N, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 1999 May;5(5):1173-82. Clin Cancer Res. 1999. PMID: 10353754
Cited by
- Recent Findings on Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines: An Updated Review.
Sheikhlary S, Lopez DH, Moghimi S, Sun B. Sheikhlary S, et al. Biomolecules. 2024 Apr 21;14(4):503. doi: 10.3390/biom14040503. Biomolecules. 2024. PMID: 38672519 Free PMC article. Review. - Peptides for Vaccine Development.
Hamley IW. Hamley IW. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2022 Mar 21;5(3):905-944. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.1c01238. Epub 2022 Feb 23. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2022. PMID: 35195008 Free PMC article. Review. - Sterilizing Immunity against COVID-19: Developing Helper T cells I and II activating vaccines is imperative.
Kyei-Barffour I, Addo SA, Aninagyei E, Ghartey-Kwansah G, Acheampong DO. Kyei-Barffour I, et al. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Dec;144:112282. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112282. Epub 2021 Oct 2. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021. PMID: 34624675 Free PMC article. Review. - The use of signal peptide domains as vaccine candidates.
Kovjazin R, Carmon L. Kovjazin R, et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(9):2733-40. doi: 10.4161/21645515.2014.970916. Epub 2014 Oct 30. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014. PMID: 25483491 Free PMC article. Review. - Characterization of novel multiantigenic vaccine candidates with pan-HLA coverage against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Kovjazin R, Shitrit D, Preiss R, Haim I, Triezer L, Fuks L, Nader AR, Raz M, Bardenstein R, Horn G, Smorodinsky NI, Carmon L. Kovjazin R, et al. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013 Mar;20(3):328-40. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00586-12. Epub 2013 Jan 2. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013. PMID: 23283639 Free PMC article.
References
- Greenberg PD. Adoptive T cell therapy of tumors: mechanisms operative in the recognition and elimination of tumor cells. Adv. Immunol. 1991;49:281–355. - PubMed
- Rosenberg SA, Spiess P, Lafreniere R. A new approach to the adoptive immunotherapy of cancer with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Science (Washington DC) 1986;233:1318–1321. - PubMed
- Townsend A, Bodmer H. Antigen recognition of class I restricted T lymphocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1989;7:601–624. - PubMed
- Yewdell JW, Bennink JR. Cell biology of antigen processing and presentation to MHC class I molecule-restricted T lymphocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1992;52:1–123. - PubMed
- Rammensee HG. MHC class I structure and function. Semin. Immunol. 1993;5:73–145.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials