Reducing the risk of unsafe injections in immunization programmes: financial and operational implications of various injection technologies - PubMed (original) (raw)

Reducing the risk of unsafe injections in immunization programmes: financial and operational implications of various injection technologies

B Aylward et al. Bull World Health Organ. 1995.

Abstract

The unsafe use and disposal of injection equipment continues to put patients, health care workers, and the general community at risk of infections such as hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus. Although the potential for unsafe injection practices varies substantially with the type of equipment that is used, technology alone cannot totally eliminate the risk. A knowledge of the cost, practicality and, most importantly, the potential for misuse, is critical for selecting the most appropriate injection equipment for each immunization setting. Four types of injection equipment are currently available for administering vaccines: sterilizable needles and syringes; standard disposable needles and syringes; autodestruct needles and syringes; and jet injectors. In general, the cost per injection is lowest with sterilizable equipment and highest with autodestruct. However, only autodestruct syringes virtually eliminate the risk of unsafe injection practices. Owing to differences in cost and programme factors, in some settings it may be appropriate to use a combination of equipment. For example, autodestruct syringes may be used in areas where it is difficult to ensure adequate supervision, while in medium-sized, fixed-site clinics with safe injection practices, sterilizable equipment will be the most cost-effective.

PIP: Every year, more than 550 million injections are administered in developing countries through the Expanded Program on Immunization. It is imperative that great care be given to providing these immunizations with only sterile injection equipment. Otherwise, children may be subjected during immunization to infections such as hepatitis B virus and HIV. Sterilizable needles and syringes, standard disposable needles and syringes, autodestruct needles and syringes, and jet injectors are currently available for administering vaccines. The design and operation of the former two types of needles and syringes are, by definition, evident. The design of autodestruct needles and syringes and jet injectors, however, is less directly apparent from their nomenclature. Autodestruct syringes have a device in the barrel which prevents the plunger from being redrawn after a single use, thereby automatically blocking the syringe and preventing it from being reused. Jet injectors deliver immunizations with a high pressure jet of fluid generated by either a hydraulic or mechanical compression system. This equipment was developed for high workload use and has been employed in immunization campaigns for many years. Low workload injectors are being developed for use in the small immunization clinic setting. In general, the cost per injection is lowest with sterilizable equipment and highest with the autodestruct device. Only autodestruct syringes, however, virtually eliminate the risk of unsafe injection practices. It must be emphasized that technology alone cannot eliminate the risk of accidental infection using unsterile injection equipment. The authors note that it may be appropriate in some settings to use a combination of equipment. For example, autodestruct syringes may be used in areas where it is difficult to ensure adequate supervision, while in medium-sized, fixed-site clinics with safe injection practices, sterilizable equipment will be the most cost-effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Am Med Assoc. 1955 Feb 19;157(8):633-7 - PubMed
    1. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1989 Jan-Feb;83(1):106 - PubMed
    1. Trop Doct. 1989 Jul;19(3):124-6 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1989 May 12;261(18):2677-84 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1988 Jan 23;1(8578):189 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources