Segregation of unreplicated chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a novel G1/M-phase checkpoint - PubMed (original) (raw)

Segregation of unreplicated chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a novel G1/M-phase checkpoint

J H Toyn et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct.

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae dbf4 and cdc7 cell cycle mutants block initiation of DNA synthesis (i.e., are iDS mutants) at 37 degrees C and arrest the cell cycle with a 1C DNA content. Surprisingly, certain dbf4 and cdc7 strains divide their chromatin at 37 degrees C. We found that the activation of the Cdc28 mitotic protein kinase and the Dbf2 kinase occurred with the correct relative timing with respect to each other and the observed division of the unreplicated chromatin. Furthermore, the division of unreplicated chromatin depended on a functional spindle. Therefore, the observed nuclear division resembled a normal mitosis, suggesting that S. cerevisiae commits to M phase in late G1 independently of S phase. Genetic analysis of dbf4 and cdc7 strains showed that the ability to restrain mitosis during a late G1 block depended on the genetic background of the strain concerned, since the dbf4 and cdc7 alleles examined showed the expected mitotic restraint in other backgrounds. This restraint was genetically dominant to lack of restraint, indicating that an active arrest mechanism, or checkpoint, was involved. However, none of the previously described mitotic checkpoint pathways were defective in the iDS strains that carry out mitosis without replicated DNA, therefore indicating that the checkpoint pathway that arrests mitosis in iDS mutants is novel. Thus, spontaneous strain differences have revealed that S. cerevisiae commits itself to mitosis in late G1 independently of entry into S phase and that a novel checkpoint mechanism can restrain mitosis if cells are blocked in late G1. We refer to this as the G1/M-phase checkpoint since it acts in G1 to restrain mitosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Genetic interactions between CDC7 and CDC28: growth inhibition of cdc28-1N by Cdc7 point mutants.
  Ohtoshi A, Arai K, Masai H. Ohtoshi A, et al. Genes Cells. 1996 Oct;1(10):895-904. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.d01-212.x. Genes Cells. 1996. PMID: 9077449
• The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint.
  Weiss E, Winey M. Weiss E, et al. J Cell Biol. 1996 Jan;132(1-2):111-23. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.1.111. J Cell Biol. 1996. PMID: 8567717 Free PMC article.
• Cell cycle regulation of the yeast Cdc7 protein kinase by association with the Dbf4 protein.
  Jackson AL, Pahl PM, Harrison K, Rosamond J, Sclafani RA. Jackson AL, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 May;13(5):2899-908. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.5.2899-2908.1993. Mol Cell Biol. 1993. PMID: 8474449 Free PMC article.
• Cdc7 protein kinase for DNA metabolism comes of age.
  Sclafani RA, Jackson AL. Sclafani RA, et al. Mol Microbiol. 1994 Mar;11(5):805-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00358.x. Mol Microbiol. 1994. PMID: 8022258 Review.
• Cdc7 kinases (DDKs) and checkpoint responses: lessons from two yeasts.
  Duncker BP, Brown GW. Duncker BP, et al. Mutat Res. 2003 Nov 27;532(1-2):21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.08.007. Mutat Res. 2003. PMID: 14643426 Review.

Cited by

• Both Chromosome Decondensation and Condensation Are Dependent on DNA Replication in C. elegans Embryos.
  Sonneville R, Craig G, Labib K, Gartner A, Blow JJ. Sonneville R, et al. Cell Rep. 2015 Jul 21;12(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.046. Epub 2015 Jul 9. Cell Rep. 2015. PMID: 26166571 Free PMC article.
• One step construction of PCR mutagenized libraries for genetic analysis by recombination cloning.
  Khalil AM, Julius JA, Bachant J. Khalil AM, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(16):e104. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm583. Epub 2007 Aug 15. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007. PMID: 17702758 Free PMC article.
• Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication.
  Sclafani RA, Holzen TM. Sclafani RA, et al. Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:237-80. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130308. Annu Rev Genet. 2007. PMID: 17630848 Free PMC article. Review.
• Genetic analysis of apomictic wine yeasts.
  Castrejón F, Martínez-Force E, Benítez T, Codón AC. Castrejón F, et al. Curr Genet. 2004 Apr;45(4):187-96. doi: 10.1007/s00294-004-0486-8. Epub 2004 Feb 4. Curr Genet. 2004. PMID: 14760507
• Genetic and biochemical evaluation of the importance of Cdc6 in regulating mitotic exit.
  Archambault V, Li CX, Tackett AJ, Wasch R, Chait BT, Rout MP, Cross FR. Archambault V, et al. Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Nov;14(11):4592-604. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-06-0384. Epub 2003 Sep 5. Mol Biol Cell. 2003. PMID: 12960422 Free PMC article.

References

1. 1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Apr 6;1217(3):239-56 - PubMed
2. 1. Bioessays. 1993 Dec;15(12):775-82 - PubMed
3. 1. Genetics. 1980 Nov;96(3):567-88 - PubMed
4. 1. J Histochem Cytochem. 1981 Jan;29(1):45-8 - PubMed
5. 1. Nature. 1992 Oct 15;359(6396):599-604 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Europe PubMed Central
  • PubMed Central
  • Taylor & Francis

• Molecular Biology Databases

  • Saccharomyces Genome Database