Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization - PubMed (original) (raw)

Comparative Study

. 1995 Jan 1;19(1):27-41.

doi: 10.1002/cyto.990190105.

Affiliations

• PMID: 7705182
• DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990190105

Free article

Comparative Study

Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization

S du Manoir et al. Cytometry. 1995.

Free article

Abstract

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a new molecular cytogenetic method for the detection of chromosomal imbalances. Following cohybridization of DNA prepared from a sample to be studied and control DNA to normal metaphase spreads, probes are detected via different fluorochromes. The ratio of the test and control fluorescence intensities along a chromosome reflects the relative copy number of segments of a chromosome in the test genome. Quantitative evaluation of CGH experiments is required for the determination of low copy changes, e.g., monosomy or trisomy, and for the definition of the breakpoints involved in unbalanced rearrangements. In this study, a program for quantitation of CGH preparations is presented. This program is based on the extraction of the fluorescence ratio profile along each chromosome, followed by averaging of individual profiles from several meta phase spreads. Objective parameters critical for quantitative evaluations were tested, and the criteria for selection of suitable CGH preparations are described. The granularity of the chromosome painting and the regional inhomogeneity of fluorescence intensities in metaphase spreads proved to be crucial parameters. The coefficient of variation of the ratio value for chromosomes in balanced state (CVBS) provides a general quality criterion for CGH experiments. Different cutoff levels (thresholds) of average fluorescence ratio values were compared for their specificity and sensitivity with regard to the detection of chromosomal imbalances.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
  Piper J, Rutovitz D, Sudar D, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Waldman FM, Gray JW, Pinkel D. Piper J, et al. Cytometry. 1995 Jan 1;19(1):10-26. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990190104. Cytometry. 1995. PMID: 7705181
• Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization.
  Lundsteen C, Maahr J, Christensen B, Bryndorf T, Bentz M, Lichter P, Gerdes T. Lundsteen C, et al. Cytometry. 1995 Jan 1;19(1):42-50. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990190106. Cytometry. 1995. PMID: 7705184
• Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
  du Manoir S, Speicher MR, Joos S, Schröck E, Popp S, Döhner H, Kovacs G, Robert-Nicoud M, Lichter P, Cremer T. du Manoir S, et al. Hum Genet. 1993 Feb;90(6):590-610. doi: 10.1007/BF00202476. Hum Genet. 1993. PMID: 8444465
• [Key technologies in image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization].
  Ni J, Ji L, Wang M. Ni J, et al. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2001 Dec;18(4):620-3. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2001. PMID: 11791323 Review. Chinese.
• [Comparative genomic hybridization(CGH)].
  Matsuta M, Nishiya I. Matsuta M, et al. Hum Cell. 1993 Sep;6(3):231-6. Hum Cell. 1993. PMID: 8297821 Review. Japanese.

Cited by

• Analysis of genomic alterations in benign, atypical, and anaplastic meningiomas: toward a genetic model of meningioma progression.
  Weber RG, Boström J, Wolter M, Baudis M, Collins VP, Reifenberger G, Lichter P. Weber RG, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14719-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14719. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997. PMID: 9405679 Free PMC article.
• Detection of chromosomal imbalances in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder by comparative genomic hybridization.
  Voorter C, Joos S, Bringuier PP, Vallinga M, Poddighe P, Schalken J, du Manoir S, Ramaekers F, Lichter P, Hopman A. Voorter C, et al. Am J Pathol. 1995 Jun;146(6):1341-54. Am J Pathol. 1995. PMID: 7778674 Free PMC article.
• Characteristic chromosomal imbalances in primary central nervous system lymphomas of the diffuse large B-cell type.
  Weber T, Weber RG, Kaulich K, Actor B, Meyer-Puttlitz B, Lampel S, Büschges R, Weigel R, Deckert-Schlüter M, Schmiedek P, Reifenberger G, Lichter P. Weber T, et al. Brain Pathol. 2000 Jan;10(1):73-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2000.tb00244.x. Brain Pathol. 2000. PMID: 10668897 Free PMC article.
• Construction of oncogenetic tree models reveals multiple pathways of oral cancer progression.
  Pathare S, Schäffer AA, Beerenwinkel N, Mahimkar M. Pathare S, et al. Int J Cancer. 2009 Jun 15;124(12):2864-71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24267. Int J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19267402 Free PMC article.
• Mosaic supernumerary ring chromosome 19 identified by comparative genomic hybridisation.
  Ghaffari SR, Boyd E, Connor JM, Jones AM, Tolmie JL. Ghaffari SR, et al. J Med Genet. 1998 Oct;35(10):836-40. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.10.836. J Med Genet. 1998. PMID: 9783708 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Wiley

• Other Literature Sources

  • The Lens - Patent Citations Database