Superiority of treadmill walking exercise versus strength training for patients with peripheral arterial disease. Implications for the mechanism of the training response - PubMed (original) (raw)

Clinical Trial

. 1994 Oct;90(4):1866-74.

doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.4.1866.

Affiliations

Clinical Trial

Superiority of treadmill walking exercise versus strength training for patients with peripheral arterial disease. Implications for the mechanism of the training response

W R Hiatt et al. Circulation. 1994 Oct.

Abstract

Background: In patients with intermittent claudication, a supervised walking exercise program increases peak exercise performance and community-based functional status. Patients with peripheral arterial disease also have muscle weakness in the affected extremity that may contribute to the walking impairment. However, the potential benefits of training modalities other than walking exercise, such as strength training, have not been critically evaluated in this patient population. The present study tested the hypothesis that a strength training program would be as effective as treadmill walking exercise and that combinations of strengthening and walking exercise would be more effective than either alone in improving exercise performance.

Methods and results: Twenty-nine patients with disabling claudication were randomized to 12 weeks of supervised walking exercise on a treadmill (3 h/wk at a work intensity sufficient to produce claudication), strength training (3 h/wk of resistive training of five muscle groups of each leg), or a nonexercising control group. Graded treadmill testing was performed to maximally tolerated claudication pain to define changes in peak exercise performance. After 12 weeks, patients in the treadmill training program had a 74 +/- 58% increase in peak walking time as well as improvements in peak oxygen consumption (VO2) and the onset of claudication pain. Patients in the strength-trained group had a 36 +/- 48% increase in peak walking time but no change in peak VO2 or claudication onset time. Control subjects had no changes in any of these measures over the 12-week period. After the first 12 weeks, patients in the initial walking exercise group continued for 12 more weeks of supervised treadmill training. This resulted in an additional 49 +/- 53% increase in peak walking time (total of 128 +/- 99% increase over the 24 weeks). After the initial 12 weeks, patients in the strength-trained group began 12 weeks of supervised treadmill training, and patients in the control group participated in a 12-week combined program of strengthening and treadmill walking exercise. The combined strength and treadmill training program and treadmill training after 12 weeks of strength training resulted in increases in peak exercise performance similar to those observed with 12 weeks of treadmill training alone.

Conclusions: A supervised treadmill walking exercise program is an effective means to improve exercise performance in patients with intermittent claudication, with continued improvement over 24 weeks of training. In contrast, 12 weeks of strength training was less effective than 12 weeks of supervised treadmill walking exercise. Finally, strength training, whether sequential or concomitant, did not augment the response to a walking exercise program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources