High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 1994 Oct;101(10):1688-95; discussion 1695-6.
Affiliations
- PMID: 7936568
High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant
J W Karesh et al. Ophthalmology. 1994 Oct.
Abstract
Background: High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) has been used successfully as an implant in orbital fracture repair and in the management of both cosmetic and post-traumatic facial deformities. The material is well tolerated, resists infection, is nonantigenic, and promotes tissue ingrowth. Additionally, sutures can be passed through it. These characteristics led to its use as an implant in anophthalmic socket surgery.
Methods: Twenty-one patients with anophthalmia underwent implantation of spherically shaped high-density porous polyethylene implants. The implant was used in six primary enucleations with direct extraocular muscle attachment, ten secondary implant insertions, one repeat secondary implant insertion, and five eviscerations.
Results: Postoperative follow-up averaged 19 months. During this period, there were no extrusions, infections, significant inflammatory responses, or implant exposures. One implant was removed 4 months after insertion due to inadequate initial placement secondary to a severe post-traumatic orbital deformity. Successful re-implantation was performed without complication. Postoperatively, all sockets showed good to excellent motility. Results of histologic examination of the removed implant demonstrated minimal inflammatory response and extensive fibrovascular ingrowth involving 60% of the implant substance.
Conclusions: This initial report indicates that high-density porous polyethylene can be used successfully as an implant in anophthalmic socket surgery. Its advantages over other similar implants include a significantly lower material cost and the ability to suture the extraocular muscles directly to it without the need for a covering material such as fascia or sclera. Experimental studies are in progress to determine if this implant can be integrated with an ocular prosthesis to promote improved motility and cosmesis.
Similar articles
- Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration.
Su GW, Yen MT. Su GW, et al. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jul;20(4):274-80. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000129528.16938.1e. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004. PMID: 15266140 - Effects of secondary porous orbital implantation in anophthalmic sockets.
Paik JS, Park HY, Cho WK, Yang SW. Paik JS, et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Nov;23(6):1677-82. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318266fb7c. J Craniofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 23147316 - High density porous polyethylene material (Medpor) as an unwrapped orbital implant.
Chen YH, Cui HG. Chen YH, et al. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2006 Aug;7(8):679-82. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0679. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2006. PMID: 16845724 Free PMC article. - Oculoplastic and orbital applications of porous high-density polyethylene implants.
Purdy EP. Purdy EP. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1997 Oct;8(5):57-63. doi: 10.1097/00055735-199710000-00012. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1997. PMID: 10174260 Review. - Anophthalmic socket: choice of orbital implants for reconstruction.
Schellini SA, El Dib R, Limongi RM, Mörschbächer R. Schellini SA, et al. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2015 Jul-Aug;78(4):260-3. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20150068. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2015. PMID: 26375346 Review.
Cited by
- Clinical application of biomaterials in orbital implants: a systematic review.
Sadeghi S, Pezeshgi S, Sadeghi R, Bayan N, Farrokhpour H, Amanollahi M, Bereimipour A, Abolghasemi Mahani A. Sadeghi S, et al. Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 27;44(1):290. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03183-w. Int Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38937319 - The Evolution of Orbital Implants and Current Breakthroughs in Material Design, Selection, Characterization, and Clinical Use.
Chen XY, Yang X, Fan XL. Chen XY, et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 17;9:800998. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.800998. eCollection 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35252161 Free PMC article. Review. - Risk Factors for Orbital Implant Extrusion after Evisceration.
Kim JM, Sung JY, Lim HB, Choi EJ, Lee SB. Kim JM, et al. J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 28;10(15):3329. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153329. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34362115 Free PMC article. - Ex Vivo and In Vivo Biocompatibility Assessment (Blood and Tissue) of Three-Dimensional Bacterial Nanocellulose Biomaterials for Soft Tissue Implants.
Osorio M, Cañas A, Puerta J, Díaz L, Naranjo T, Ortiz I, Castro C. Osorio M, et al. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 22;9(1):10553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46918-x. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31332259 Free PMC article. - Injectable silicone rubber for ocular implantation after evisceration.
Zheng PF, You QS, Li Q, Deng HY, Wong IYH, Peng XY. Zheng PF, et al. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 23;13(3):e0193448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193448. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29570703 Free PMC article.