Parser for protein folding units - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
Parser for protein folding units
L Holm et al. Proteins. 1994 Jul.
Abstract
General patterns of protein structural organization have emerged from studies of hundreds of structures elucidated by X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance. Structural units are commonly identified by visual inspection of molecular models using qualitative criteria. Here, we propose an algorithm for identification of structural units by objective, quantitative criteria based on atomic interactions. The underlying physical concept is maximal interactions within each unit and minimal interaction between units (domains). In a simple harmonic approximation, interdomain dynamics is determined by the strength of the interface and the distribution of masses. The most likely domain decomposition involves units with the most correlated motion, or largest interdomain fluctuation time. The decomposition of a convoluted 3-D structure is complicated by the possibility that the chain can cross over several times between units. Grouping the residues by solving an eigenvalue problem for the contact matrix reduces the problem to a one-dimensional search for all reasonable trial bisections. Recursive bisection yields a tree of putative folding units. Simple physical criteria are used to identify units that could exist by themselves. The units so defined closely correspond to crystallographers' notion of structural domains. The results are useful for the analysis of folding principles, for modular protein design and for protein engineering.
Similar articles
- Automatic domain decomposition of proteins by a Gaussian Network Model.
Kundu S, Sorensen DC, Phillips GN Jr. Kundu S, et al. Proteins. 2004 Dec 1;57(4):725-33. doi: 10.1002/prot.20268. Proteins. 2004. PMID: 15478120 - Cancer-related mutations in BRCA1-BRCT cause long-range structural changes in protein-protein binding sites: a molecular dynamics study.
Gough CA, Gojobori T, Imanishi T. Gough CA, et al. Proteins. 2007 Jan 1;66(1):69-86. doi: 10.1002/prot.21188. Proteins. 2007. PMID: 17063491 - Combinatorial docking approach for structure prediction of large proteins and multi-molecular assemblies.
Inbar Y, Benyamini H, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Inbar Y, et al. Phys Biol. 2005 Nov 9;2(4):S156-65. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/2/4/S10. Phys Biol. 2005. PMID: 16280621
Cited by
- Hinge Atlas: relating protein sequence to sites of structural flexibility.
Flores SC, Lu LJ, Yang J, Carriero N, Gerstein MB. Flores SC, et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 May 22;8:167. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-167. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007. PMID: 17519025 Free PMC article. - Finding weak similarities between proteins by sequence profile comparison.
Panchenko AR. Panchenko AR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 15;31(2):683-9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg154. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003. PMID: 12527777 Free PMC article. - Continuous and discontinuous domains: an algorithm for the automatic generation of reliable protein domain definitions.
Siddiqui AS, Barton GJ. Siddiqui AS, et al. Protein Sci. 1995 May;4(5):872-84. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040507. Protein Sci. 1995. PMID: 7663343 Free PMC article. - Local feature frequency profile: a method to measure structural similarity in proteins.
Choi IG, Kwon J, Kim SH. Choi IG, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 16;101(11):3797-802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308656100. Epub 2004 Feb 25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004. PMID: 14985506 Free PMC article. - A comparison of position-specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments.
Panchenko AR, Bryant SH. Panchenko AR, et al. Protein Sci. 2002 Feb;11(2):361-70. doi: 10.1110/ps.19902. Protein Sci. 2002. PMID: 11790846 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources